Search for: "In Re Application of US for an Order"
Results 141 - 160
of 15,052
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2022, 3:11 am
The Board observed that one must show "excusable neglect" in order to justify the requested re-opening. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:21 am
As the applicants acknowledged, Zachariades contained all the steps of the applicants’ claims, but in a different order – irradiation occurred after cooling. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 6:42 am
Hyatt had brought an action in district court to order the Patent Office to grant multiple long-standing applications. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 1:22 pm
However, they’re often used by women as a tool to get a leg up in their divorce case. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 3:09 pm
The I601A Application for Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver is only used to waive the 3- or 10-year ban in order to keep families together.One of the biggest differences between the two forms is the reason for being denied entry to the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
Affirming the PTO's refusal to register, the Board found Applicant Sagoma's specimen of use unacceptable for the mark DIGITALBOOK for, inter alia, binders for holding media discs. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 6:24 am
The post Back to B.C.: Court Re-examines Google Takedown Order In Light of U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:13 pm
Here are some of the most universally applicable: -- If you're not here, you're not getting what you ordered. -- The corollary to this is: "Any money saved from not coming to China (multiple times) will be lost in missed delivery dates and/or labor paid to repair product. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:44 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] In re iPhone Application Litig., 11-MD-02250-LHK (N.D. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
Aytan & Ors v Moore & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER) (2022) UKUT 27 (LC) We’re late to this one from January 2022, but it is an important initial decision on benchmarking the proportion of rent that a rent repayment order should be made for. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:36 am
An order from, say, Scotland, can be registered in England by way of an application to the Court in England. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:49 am
Of course, the plaintiff still had to show that the instrument was in the exclusive control of the defendant in order for res ipsa to apply. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:26 am
But see In re Application for an Order Authorizing the Extension and Use of a Pen Register Device, 2007 WL 397129 (E.D. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
On Wednesday January 27, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court denied 19 applications for leave to appeal, denied the petitioner-appellants’ motion for reconsideration in the case of In re Brandon Gavin Handorf, Case Nos. 139742, 139753, 139754, and adopted the recommendation of the Judicial Tenure Commission in In re Nebel, Case No. 140203, and In re Sanders, Case No. 140202. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:18 pm
Of course, if you happen to have an idea of what you’re looking for – maybe you’re interested in a particular applicant, or a particular community, channel, state, etc. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:30 pm
Citing past precedent, the CAFC went on to state that "we have consistently held that a patent applicant “need not sell every conceivable embodiment of the claims in order to rely upon evidence of commercial success. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:15 am
Applicant's specimens of use did not suggest any of these.] [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:54 am
Pierorazio In re: Lawrence Everatt Anderson, http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/16-1156.Opinion.10-11-2016.1.PDF The Federal Circuit holds that “the speed being displayed on the display for use by a motorist in determining a route of travel” is a non-limiting statement of intended use because the “‘for use’ language does not add a structural limitation to the claimed system or method. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
The respondents argued that, since August 2011, the applicant had made, sold, used, offered for sale and/or imported an anti-parasitic formulation under the trademark entitled Ivermax LA Platinum and had infringed the patent. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
The respondents argued that, since August 2011, the applicant had made, sold, used, offered for sale and/or imported an anti-parasitic formulation under the trademark entitled Ivermax LA Platinum and had infringed the patent. [read post]
