Search for: "In Re Armstrong"
Results 21 - 40
of 617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2012, 7:00 am
It is up in the air as to whether or not federal prosecutors will re-open the criminal investigation into Armstrong’s doping after it was dropped back in February. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 1:11 am
In fact, if you’re hoping to use a picture of Armstrong on the moon tonight: Rots of Ruck to you. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 2:20 am
Meet Jennifer Armstrong-Owen, VP of People at talent platform SeekOut. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:48 am
" Since the Court made no ruling on the actual merits of the case, Armstrong's legal team will re-file a shorter complaint, but the 7-time Tour winner did not have a good start to this lawsuit [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 5:48 am
The judge gave the plaintiff 20 days to re-file its complaint. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:15 pm
We're a post-racial society. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 2:04 am
Armstrong’s admissions in 2012, SCA asked the same arbitration panel to re-convene and order Armstrong to pay back the money. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:37 pm
Below are Armstrong’s prepared remarks to the graduates. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:21 pm
In spite of all the terrible things we're learning about the 15+ year conspiracy led by Lance Armstrong, I still don't believe that it was fair or just to go back in time and take away his #TdF titles. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 5:17 am
In a recent ruling, three arbitrators, in a 2-1 vote, ordered that Lance re-pay the bonus. [read post]
11 May 2023, 3:58 am
Heather Armstrong was a social media visionary. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
No re-dos. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:43 am
Toast & Roast to Armstrong Hall 3:30 p.m. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 12:40 pm
This letter was prompted by reaction to the re-airing of the “60 Minutes” segment earlier this month by Chris Kraft, who argued that the segment distorted the views of Armstrong, Gene Cernan, and others. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:42 am
For example, the legal doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata are both based on the principle that you cannot re-litigate an issue that's already been decided by a court. [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 11:15 am
In In re World Health Alternatives, Inc., Case No. 06-10166 (July 7, 2006), the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware held that—notwithstanding the Third Circuit’s recent opinion, In re Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 432 F.3d 507 (3d Cir. 2005)—a... [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 11:15 am
In In re World Health Alternatives, Inc., Case No. 06-10166 (July 7, 2006), the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware held that—notwithstanding the Third Circuit’s recent opinion, In re Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 432 F.3d 507 (3d Cir. 2005)—a... [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:58 pm
We’re too implicated and we don’t know what to do with it. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:58 am
Armstrong asserts that the State should be stopped from raising res judicata as a defense, and further, judicial estoppels should preclude the State from claiming the breach of contract issues were decided in federal court.3. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 8:58 am
We're GO. [read post]
