Search for: "In Re Austin A. Et Al." Results 1 - 20 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2008, 12:00 pm
Combs, et al., No. 03-07-00640-CV (August 15, 2008), an apportionment case under the former version of the franchise tax that’s likely to continue to be important under the revised version of the tax, the so-called “Margin Tax. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:49 am by Don Cruse
September 13, 2011 Finance Commission of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 3:20 pm
In an order issued Friday in a case captioned In re: Sarah Steed, et. al., (TX Ct. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 1:07 pm
It turns out that Tuesday's post about FLDS appeals coming to Austin was timely. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 4:42 pm
Cette condition correspond à l'art. 12 al. 3 LPM. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Don Cruse
Williamson County, et al., No. 10-0671 In re Frank Kent Motor Co. d/b/a Frank Kent Cadillac, No. 10-0687 Jack Edward Milner v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The legal position for which Keller et. al. are being punished has been nontroversial in living memory. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Alan E. Sherman
Combs, et al., Cause Number D-1-GN-11-000947, in the Travis County District Court, and the service is web hosting which the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts treats as a taxable “data processing” service under Texas Tax Code Sections 151.0035 and 151.0101(a)(12). [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:39 am by Don Cruse
” I can’t write the usual summaries for the other four cases just yet, but here’s a list of the cases decided to tide you over: Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd., et al . v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
The House of Lords did not pursue this interpretation in Knowsley, largely because Counsel for all parties (including Jan Luba QC) submitted that the then Housing and Regeneration Act would remedy this issue via the replacement tenancy, and in view of the may thousands of cases that had already been based on Thompson et al. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
The House of Lords did not pursue this interpretation in Knowsley, largely because Counsel for all parties (including Jan Luba QC) submitted that the then Housing and Regeneration Act would remedy this issue via the replacement tenancy, and in view of the may thousands of cases that had already been based on Thompson et al. [read post]