Search for: "In Re Baths Intern., Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
October 13, 022 - 2 PM (In Person): In re Baxter S.r.l., Serial No. 90172106 [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark BAXTER for carpets and rugs, excluding bath mats and for related retail store services, in view of the registered mark CHASING BAXTER for bath mats.] [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:31 pm
[…] Versata Soft., Inc., at *2 (some internal citations omitted).Appeal MootIn First Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:24 am
July 15, 2015 - 11 AM: In re Johnson & Johnson, Serial No.77684321 [Refusal to register the mark BEST FOR BABY for "Toiletries, namely, baby bath skin cleansers and washes, and baby lotion," on the ground that applicant's specimens do not establish trademark use.]July 21, 2015 - 2 PM: In re Epiq Systems, Inc., Serial Nos. 85979129 and 85978692 [Refusal to register the marks DMX MOBILE and DOCUMATRIX MOBILE for "Consulting in the field of… [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:14 am
Society for Human Resource Management, 27 USPQ2d 1423 (TTAB 1993); and In re International Telephone & Telephone Corp., 197 USPQ 910, 911 (TTAB 1978). [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm by Michael Douglas
Many of the changes seemingly involve a simple a re-wording or a re-structure rather than anything radical, although I am sure that the case law will tease out differences of substance in coming months. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
: Federal Administrative Court rulings in CALVI and TRELLEBORG cases (International Law Office) Motion marks: Swiss IPO allows Swisscom to file MPG-file of motion mark in motion (Class 46)   United Kingdom Class dispute over similarity of goods too complex for summary judgment: Daimler AG v Sany Group Co Ltd (Class 46) The war on counterfeits: how much would you spend? [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
  We’re left with the essentials. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 8:35 pm
The Mortgage Bankers association had previously lambasted the rule change as "throwing the baby out with the bath water. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 8:35 pm
The Mortgage Bankers association had previously lambasted the rule change as "throwing the baby out with the bath water. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Litigation Blog) New Jersey local patent rules (IP Frontline)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC applies KSR – finding combination claims obvious: Ball Aerosol v Limited Brands, Bath & Body Works etc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) CAFC rejects lower court’s ob [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm by HSnader
Dunkin’ Donuts IHOP Bridgestone DuPont IKEA Buffalo Wild Wings Duracell ln-N-Out Burger Campbell’s Soup Eddie V’s International Paper Carl’s Jr. [read post]