Search for: "In Re Baycol Products Litigation"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Instead it was the usual academic Greek chorus of criticism, with the only “diversity” being differing avenues of criticism.Having smacked that one down, we’re feeling like Mickey Mouse as the Sorcerer’s Apprentice in Fantasia – smash one broom and two more rise up in its place. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
In re Baycol Products Litigation, ---F.3d---, No. 08-3524, 2010 WL 711972 (8th Cir. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 1:17 pm
In re Baycol Products Litig., ___ F.3d ___ (8th Cir. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
Here’s a link to the slip opinion: In re Baycol Products Litigation, No. 09-1069 (8th Cir., Jan. 5 2010). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
” In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, 1995 WL 428683, at *1-2 (E.D. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
In re Baycol Products Litig., ___ F.3d ___ (8th Cir. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 8:07 pm
In re Baycol Products Litig., 593 F.3d 716 (8th Cir. 2010) [Slip Opn., at 2, 3.] [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:30 am
In re Baycol Products Litigation, 218 F.R.D. 197, 202 (D. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:50 am
It's as good a statement as you're likely to find of the essential nature of a prescription product and why what we do is different from litigation involving office chairs or power tools, which any person off the street can buy with no questions asked. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:49 am
"They're repeat offenders on a number of fronts in the way that they market their products," said Stephen Gardner, CSPI's chief litigator in the latest multivitamin lawsuit. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
July 25, 2008) (Texas statute); In re Aredia & Zometa Products Liability Litigation, 2008 WL 913087, at *2 (M.D. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:45 am
(For other examples of plaintiff fact sheets, see In re Baycol Products Litigation, MDL 1431, Pretrial Order No. 10 (D. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
See In re A.H. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:28 am
See In re Baycol Prods. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
[T]o succeed on either the unjust enrichment or breach of warranty claims, Plaintiffs would have to demonstrate that they were either injured by [the drug], or that [the drug] did not provide them any health benefits.In re Baycol Products Litigation, 218 F.R.D. 197, 213-14 (D. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
We've blogged before about the importance of both sides in personal injury litigation - and especially drug/medical device product liability litigation involving the learned intermediary rule - having equal rights to talk to treating/prescribing physicians. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
May 9, 2005) (entering Lone Pine order); In re Baycol Prods. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Personal injury case.In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, 2007 WL 3334339 (E.D. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
Jude Medical, Inc., Silzone Heart Valves Products Liability LitigationMDL-1401 IN RE Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., Hip Prosthesis and Knee Prosthesis Products Liability LitigationMDL-1407 IN RE Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability LitigationMDL-1431 IN RE Baycol Products Liability LitigationMDL-1477 IN RE Serzone Products Liability LitigationMDL-1481 IN RE Meridia Products Liability… [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Consumer fraud claims of patients using Propulsid who suffered no physical injury and did not allege paying for the drug alleged insufficient injury.In re Propulsid Products Liability Litigation, 208 F.R.D. 133 (E.D. [read post]
