Search for: "In Re Blatt"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 6:28 am
Early in Lisa Blatt’s argument for Starbucks, Justice Sonia Sotomayor commented, “I do understand why that needs to be corrected because you’re right, it’s the court that has to decide the likelihood of [success] on the merits. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:05 pm
Blatt elaborated. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
” “And you’re saying,” he said to Blatt, “they can all sit there unused, except for one person who alleges that I was the only person in America who’s ever been prosecuted for this because I dared express a view protected by the First Amendment and that’s not actionable? [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm
” Though Blatt insisted that her interpretation rested directly on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Barnett Bank v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
They’re not doing ordinary judging. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Here, the court applied the same “Blatt” factors it did regarding the injunction against future violations.Under Blatt, the court considers the following: (1) how egregious were the defendant's actions; (2) whether the alleged violations were isolated or recurring; (3) whether the violations involved scienter; (4) whether the defendant provided sincere assurances that he or she will not repeat the violations; (5) whether the defendant grasps the wrongful nature of… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
Register here.Today's DJ insert Leading Commercial Litigators 2024 includes appellate lawyers Lisa Blatt, Ted Boutrous, and Theane Evangelis. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 11:09 am
Blatt, chair of Williams & Connolly LLP’s Supreme Court and Appellate Practice, told the annual meeting of the 9th U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
On the other hand, I mean, we’re a court. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
She told Blatt that, in her view, “what you’re describing as the problem is courts grappling with the degree of expressiveness of various items in terms of determining whether or not this art, Rogers, exception should apply. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 11:17 am
Blatt, the lawyer for Jack Daniel's, who'd just said — transcript here — "Justice Alito, I don't know how old you are, but you went to law school, you're very smart, you're analytical, you have hindsight bias, and maybe you know something.... [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 11:44 am
BLATT: Justice Alito, I don't know how old you are, but you went to law school, you're very smart, you're analytical, you have hindsight bias, and maybe you know something - JUSTICE ALITO: Well, I went to a law school where I didn't learn any law - MS. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Google’s counsel, Lisa Blatt, did specifically point to the amici briefs raising free speech concerns. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am
Blatt's "the sky is falling" stuff to accept something about, boy, there is a lot of uncertainty about going the way you would have us go, in part, just because of the difficulty of drawing lines in this area and just because of the fact that, once we go with you, all of a sudden we're finding that Google isn't protected. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:02 am
“We’re a court,” she said. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Blatt did not seem fully to grasp [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 3:26 pm
“We have considered that” question, he continued, “and we’re prepared to deal with it. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
(William Hennessy) Sometime after Blatt refers to a page of the 2nd Circuit decision that “they’re yakking about,” Justice Samuel Alito picks up on her word choice. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
Roman Martinez (Latham Watkins) is set to argue for Warhol and Lisa Blatt (Williams Connolly) for Goldsmith. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm
Featuring Paul Clement, Lisa Blatt, and Kelsi Brown Corkran, the event is nearly full! [read post]
