Search for: "In Re Blatt" Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
The President re-nominated him in January 2013, and he was confirmed in May. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:03 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Last we checked, it costs adoptive parents $27,500 to adopt a child (see here: In re TSW, page 127). [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:12 pm by Don Maurice
So if you’re not a bad-faith harassing plaintiff, but you nonetheless lost, then you’re under 54(d). * * * Congress gave defendants something more here. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:39 am by kealey
Deborah McGovern Emerging Technologies & Reference Librarian Charleston School of Law Sol Blatt Jr. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm by Deborah McGovern
Deborah McGovern Emerging Technologies & Reference Librarian Charleston School of Law Sol Blatt Jr. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:24 am
Ecuador 'is one of the countries that are easier to pick on – you're not going to see judges pick on French or British judgments.'So explains Professor Montré D. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:51 am by Michelle Yeary
., 569 N.E.2d 875, 879 (Ohio 1991) (the prescriber’s treatment of plaintiff under a manufacturer’s research protocol and receipt of a per patient payment from the manufacturer did not affect physician’s independence).Blatt v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
It was the last blank space on the legal map – the only state with no precedent whatsoever. [read post]
3 May 2011, 8:01 am by Sonya Hubbard
Not to mention hundreds of other sites, including the one that you’re reading right now. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:56 pm by David Oscar Markus
Lisa Blatt of Arnold & Porter wrote excellent amicus briefs in the case.UPDATED -- The New York Times covers the grant here. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by Jonathan H. Adler
“They’re way more active than they’ve ever been,” said Lisa S. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:59 am by Theo Francis
Other times, we’re pretty sure someone wants to avoid attention. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:34 am by David Vasella
Dann wäre in der Tat der Anscheinsbeweis für den Zugang der Mitteilung erbracht worden. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:18 pm by Orin Kerr
ANOTHER UPDATE: Tom Goldstein's terrific 2006 post, The Expansion of the "Supreme Court Bar", is worth re-reading on these issues. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Spicy IP), India: Supreme Court on exclusive marketing rights: (Spicy IP), Japan: First induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell patent at Kyoto University: (Competitive Info), Slovenia: Supplementary protection certificates in Slovenia: (The SPC Blog), United States: Biotech/pharma lobbying scoreboard – second quarter update – part II: (Patent Docs), United States: Ferring Pharmaceuticals argues to bring down direct purchaser suits: (Law 360), United States: Transferred… [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 6:42 pm
Daniel Blatt is unpersuaded by Ahmadinejad's claims. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
We're warning you, if you're not a lawyer, then you'll find this post very boring. [read post]