Search for: "In Re Bobbitt"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2021, 12:53 pm
Bobbitt’s “services to UK/US relations and public life. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:01 am
In D.C., you just show up, pay your $75 or whatever it is, sign your form, and you’re ready to go. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 12:26 pm
Yes, we’re getting ahead of ourselves. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 11:57 am
" (If you're too young to know who she is, click here.) [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:13 pm
Quinn II and Anthony Bobbitt, both of North Carolina, were indicted with three others on criminal charges of wire fraud, bank fraud and conspiracy. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 2:04 pm
re [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:27 am
Bobbitt's penis, which was later re-attached by surgeons. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:27 am
The agents discovered that the magnetic strips on seven of the thirty-one cards had been re-encoded, i.e. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:55 am
Bobbitt. [read post]
The problematics of impeachment (I): The specific problems of Charles Black's take on the presidency
29 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
But Black still believed, as does Bobbitt, that lawyers have some special insight into what it should take to displace a president. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
& Philip Bobbitt, Impeachment: A Handbook (2018). [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 8:11 am
Rather, Jim Lehrer, who, we're informed has moderated eleven presidential debates since 1988. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 11:35 am
But we’re talking Bruce Wayne fake public persona level idiocy here. 3. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:19 am
That’s what you’re paid for. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm
Philip Bobbitt writes that the House should pause the impeachment process. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:03 pm
As Philip Bobbitt said “law is something we do, not something we have”. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:59 am
One important task of this article is to rethink the familiar model of modalities of argument offered by Philip Bobbitt and Richard Fallon; and to offer a different version that better reflects the multiple ways that lawyers and judges actually use history in constitutional argument. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:55 am
Despite the dominance of original public meaning originalism in originalist theory, lawyers actually use adoption history quite differently than academic theory prescribes.Sixth, precisely because originalist arguments (in constitutional construction) generally appeal to ethos and tradition, they will normally not be persuasive unless the audience can plausibly accept the values of the adopters as their own or can re-characterize them so that they can plausibly accept them as their own. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
The example of Gerald Ford, which Professor Tribe cites, might go the other way: Ford’s re-election is widely assumed to have been doomed by his pardon of Richard Nixon, hardly an incentive to future vice presidents contemplating a pardon for a humiliated and disdained former president. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
