Search for: "In Re Bose Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2014, 1:31 pm
We all know that the CAFC in In re Bose Corporation jettisoned the TTAB’s “knew or should have known” standard for fraud set out in Medinol v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:05 am
In its fraud analysis in In re Bose Corporation, 91 USPQ2d 1938 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:09 pm
OVERTURNED BY: In Re Bose Corp., Opp. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:36 am
In re Nittany Corporation, Serial No. 88439889 (March 17, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Did they miss your submission, or was it not relevant? [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:44 pm
See In re Bose Corporation, 476 F.3d 1331, 91 USPQ2d 1938, 1941 (Fed. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:20 pm
This ruling, issued in In re Bose Corporation, Opposition No. 91/157,315, 2009 WL 2709312 (Fed. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:12 am
"The Board distinguished this case from In re Bose, where it was not unreasonable for the corporate officer who signed the Section 8 declaration there at issue to believe that the mark was in use in interstate commerce. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:25 am
Citing In Re Bose, 476 F.2d 1331 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
In the seminal fraud case of In re Bose, the CAFC left open the question of whether “reckless disregard” for the truth is sufficient for a finding of fraud on the USPTO. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:38 pm
And trust remains a critical facet of effective corporate governance. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:30 am
We all know that the CAFC in In re Bose Corporation jettisoned the TTAB’s “knew or should have known” standard for fraud set out in Medinol v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:16 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.October 12, 2010 - 11 AM: Bose Corporation v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:54 am
Cobra Electronics Corporation, Opposition No. 91162506 [Opposition to registration of the mark COBRA.for vehicle alarm systems on the grounds of lack of bona fide intent and likelihood of confusion with Opposer's snake-branded vehicle security, vehicle remote start, and vehicle tracking products].November 12, 2009 - 10 AM: Bose Corporation v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:55 am
” In re Bose Corporation, No. 2008-1448 (Fed. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:32 am
In a case perhaps more significant as a curiosity than as a jurisprudential landmark, the Board sustained a fraud claim for the first time since the CAFC issued its 2009 decision in In re Bose. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The quality and integrity of corporate decision-making is constantly being tested by new rules and regulations governing corporate compliance. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The quality and integrity of corporate decision-making is constantly being tested by new rules and regulations governing corporate compliance. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
In re Bose Corp., 580 F.3d 1240, 91 USPQ2d 1938 (Fed. [read post]
