Search for: "In Re Brian W. Et Al." Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2007, 10:43 am
I constantly push the book by Doug Rae et al., Equalities, and its demonstration that there are 108 logically consistent notions of that term. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm by fjhinojosa
Beyer et al., The Fine Art of Intimidating Disgruntled Beneficiaries with In Terrorem Clauses, 51 SMU L. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
See also R v R (BS), supra note 108. 203 See R v B (R) (2005), 77 OR (3d) 171, 202 OAC 115, 66 WCB (2d) 462 at para 28 (CA). 204 R v McNamara et al (No 1) (1981), 56 CCC (2d) 193 at 346-49 (Ont CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused (1981), 56 CCC (2d) 576; R v W (LK) (1999), 138 CCC (3d) 449, 126 OAC 39 at para 69 (CA); R v Brown (1999), 137 CCC (3d) 400, 27 CR (5th) 151, 123 OAC 258 at para 32 (CA). 205 See R v McNamara et al (No 1), supra note 204 at 349.… [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:39 pm
  The moral opprobrium belongs to the policy-makers -- Cheney, Rumsfeld, Feith, et al. -- not the lawyers who merely provided advice. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am by Roshonda Scipio
[et al.].Antwerp ; Portland, OR : Intersentia, c2010EvidenceKF9672 .E938 2009Expert testimony on the psychology of eyewitness identification / edited by Brian L. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
" Janet Sigal et al. 1985, "The Effect of Presentation Style and Sex of Lawyer on Jury Decision-Making Behavior," in Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior. [read post]