Search for: "In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am by Andrew Trask
Sears, Roebuck & Co.), conceded that this left open a distinct issue of judge-shopping, one that his colleague Judge Easterbrook had identified long ago in In re Bridgestone/Firestone. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 11:11 am by Sean Wajert
In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 288 F.3d 1012, 1017 (7th Cir. 2002) (“No injury, no tort” is an ingredient of every state’s law). 2020 IL 124999, ¶¶ 29-30. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Bexis
  So bye-bye Smith.Ironically, the one place where the Bridgestone/Firestone principle might live on is in those states (California is one, and we're sure there are others - Texas?) [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 8:30 am
On the one hand, in In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Appellants rely principally on the Seventh Circuit's decision in In re Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., 288 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir.2002) ("Bridgestone"), a case involving the certification of a nationwide class alleging tort claims arising under the laws of all fifty states. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am by Bexis
 The Supreme Court overturned one of our sentimental favorites, In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:40 am by Sean Wajert
See, e.g., In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 288 F.3d 1012, 1018-19 (7th Cir. 2002) (noting that class treatment of tire defect litigation was unmanageable in part because individual factors could affect the alleged tire failure); Sanneman v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:47 am
In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 288 F.3d 1012, 1020-21 (7th Cir.2002); Elizabeth M. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 55 Pa. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 55 Pa. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 55 Pa. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 55 Pa. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am by Andrew Trask
Sears, Roebuck & Co.), conceded that this left open a distinct issue of judge-shopping, one that his colleague Judge Easterbrook had identified long ago in In re Bridgestone/Firestone. [read post]