Search for: "In Re Burrus"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm
The Bulletin describes these cases, culminating with In re D.L.D, 203 N.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm
Look how quickly she cabins unhelpful precedent: It is true that Congress lacks a general power over domestic relations, In re Burrus (1890), and, as a result, responsibility for regulating marriage and child custody remains primarily with the States, Sosna v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:35 pm
In re Burrus, 275 N.C. 517 (1969), G.S. 7B-2412. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:50 am
There is no need to rush through a significant re-write of current U.S. cross-border rules. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
This view is somewhat at odds with the holding by the Supreme Court of North Carolina that juvenile proceedings are not criminal prosecutions and that a finding of delinquency is not synonymous with a conviction, see In re Burrus, 275 N.C. 517 (1969), and Juvenile Code provisions specifying that an adjudication of delinquency is not a criminal conviction, see G.S. 7B-2412. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:01 am
But this doesn’t mean that we’re including only violent crimes. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:25 am
Now they’re going to try to bring back the old identity-spoils system [Gail Heriot, RealClearPolitics] “Identifying #NeverNeeded Regulation after COVID-19” [Cato Daily Podcast with Caleb Brown and Matthew D. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 9:06 am
You can watch yesterday’s Cato online panel on COVID-19 and the Constitution with Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and me. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:29 am
Levy Center for Constitutional Studies at the Cato Institute, where Trevor Burrus is a research fellow and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:58 am
Review and clarification by high court sorely needed [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus and Patrick Moran on Cato amicus brief in Evergreen Freedom Foundation v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 3:09 am
[Trevor Burrus] Trying to count how many journalists Donald Trump has threatened to sue “quickly turned into a fool’s errand. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:20 pm
And I have a second question: What makes you think that you’re not being scammed? [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:15 pm
Cato reactions: Trevor Burrus (“The lack of a blockbuster decision in Friedrichs is one of the most significant immediate consequences of Scalia’s death”), Jason Bedrick (“Not only do agency fees violate the First Amendment rights of workers by forcing them to financially support inherently political activities with which they may disagree (as my colleague Ilya Shapiro and Jayme Weber explained), but the unions often negotiate contracts that work against the best… [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm
Barbara Mikulski says labor regulations go too far, maybe they go too far [Rachel Weiner, Washington Post] Lawsuit: California shouldn’t be letting private employees work seven days in a row whether they want to or not [Trevor Burrus, Cato; Mendoza v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Richard Re covered the decision for this blog, with commentary from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View and Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
At Cato at Liberty, Trevor Burrus discusses the amicus brief that Cato filed in Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:37 pm
#CatoSOTU — Trevor Burrus (@TCBurrus) January 21, 2015 At @overlawyered I just RT'd tweet re: Prez's lame "pay gap" talk. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
The domestic-relations exception to federal jurisdiction derives from the Constitution’s and federal statutes’ limiting the judicial power to cases in law and equity Reflecting our federal structure, in which the states remain sovereign in the spheres not delegated to the federal government, the Supreme Court’s 1890 In re Burrus decision recognized a “domestic-relations” exception to federal jurisdiction: “The whole subject of the domestic… [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
That notion dates all the way back to a Supreme Court decision in 1890 in the case of In re Burrus. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:41 pm
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1890 decision in In re Burrus, it has been understood that the federal courts lack jurisdiction over at least some issues of “domestic relations” law. [read post]
