Search for: "In Re Burrus" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2022, 3:50 am by Kyle Hulehan
There is no need to rush through a significant re-write of current U.S. cross-border rules. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am by Jacquelyn Greene
This view is somewhat at odds with the holding by the Supreme Court of North Carolina that juvenile proceedings are not criminal prosecutions and that a finding of delinquency is not synonymous with a conviction, see In re Burrus, 275 N.C. 517 (1969), and Juvenile Code provisions specifying that an adjudication of delinquency is not a criminal conviction, see G.S. 7B-2412. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:01 am by Emma Broches, Julia Solomon-Strauss
But this doesn’t mean that we’re including only violent crimes. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:25 am by Walter Olson
Now they’re going to try to bring back the old identity-spoils system [Gail Heriot, RealClearPolitics] “Identifying #NeverNeeded Regulation after COVID-19” [Cato Daily Podcast with Caleb Brown and Matthew D. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 9:06 am by Walter Olson
You can watch yesterday’s Cato online panel on COVID-19 and the Constitution with Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and me. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:29 am by Ilya Shapiro and Trevor Burrus
Levy Center for Constitutional Studies at the Cato Institute, where Trevor Burrus is a research fellow and editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Review and clarification by high court sorely needed [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus and Patrick Moran on Cato amicus brief in Evergreen Freedom Foundation v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 3:09 am by Walter Olson
[Trevor Burrus] Trying to count how many journalists Donald Trump has threatened to sue “quickly turned into a fool’s errand. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:20 pm by David Post
And I have a second question: What makes you think that you’re not being scammed? [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Cato reactions: Trevor Burrus (“The lack of a blockbuster decision in Friedrichs is one of the most significant immediate consequences of Scalia’s death”), Jason Bedrick (“Not only do agency fees violate the First Amendment rights of workers by forcing them to financially support inherently political activities with which they may disagree (as my colleague Ilya Shapiro and Jayme Weber explained), but the unions often negotiate contracts that work against the best… [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Barbara Mikulski says labor regulations go too far, maybe they go too far [Rachel Weiner, Washington Post] Lawsuit: California shouldn’t be letting private employees work seven days in a row whether they want to or not [Trevor Burrus, Cato; Mendoza v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
  Richard Re covered the decision for this blog, with commentary from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View and Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
At Cato at Liberty, Trevor Burrus discusses the amicus brief that Cato filed in Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:37 pm by Walter Olson
#CatoSOTU — Trevor Burrus (@TCBurrus) January 21, 2015 At @overlawyered I just RT'd tweet re: Prez's lame "pay gap" talk. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am by Larry Joseph
The domestic-relations exception to federal jurisdiction derives from the Constitution’s and federal statutes’ limiting the judicial power to cases in law and equity Reflecting our federal structure, in which the states remain sovereign in the spheres not delegated to the federal government, the Supreme Court’s 1890 In re Burrus decision recognized a “domestic-relations” exception to federal jurisdiction: “The whole subject of the domestic… [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Lyle Denniston
That notion dates all the way back to a Supreme Court decision in 1890 in the case of In re Burrus. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1890 decision in In re Burrus, it has been understood that the federal courts lack jurisdiction over at least some issues of “domestic relations” law. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Huffington Post calls for “sanctions” for press outlets that engage in “dishonest, demonizing” coverage of Muslims, immigrants, and asylum seekers [Guardian] SCOTUS should hear case re: right to engage in political advocacy without registering with government [Ilya Shapiro and Trevor Burrus, Cato; Vermont Right to Life Committee v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the relationship between circuit precedent and qualified immunity in the wake of last week’s summary reversal in Carroll v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am by Amy Howe
  At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re lists the “top ten” moments from yesterday’s oral argument, while at ISCOTUSnow Edward Lee predicts the winners in both of yesterday’s cases based on the number of questions at oral argument. [read post]