Search for: "In Re Canadian Pacific Limited"
Results 41 - 60
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 5:58 am
The North America Free Trade Agreement renegotiation is likely to start within the next few months as the U.S. triggers provisions that will re-open Canada’s most important trade deal. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 7:22 am
Canadian Pacific Railway, [1973] S.C.R. 654, the Supreme Court of Canada had decided that CPP payments were deductible in calculating monies due under the Families’ Compensation Act of British Columbia. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
President-Elect Donald Trump has ended any further speculation about the future of the Trans Pacific Partnership by announcing that he plans to formally withdraw from the agreement on his first day in office. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:57 am
Fourth, the Trans Pacific Partnership is in trouble, but if Canada moves forward with the deal, it will have agreed to no limitations on access to foreign video providers and no discriminatory payment requirements. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 2:29 pm
Canadian and Australian Joint Investigation The OPC and OAIC did not focus or report any conclusions with respect to the cause of the breach itself. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:13 am
So while businesses may be a beneficiary of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, average middle-class Canadians, lower-income Canadians, would actually end up having to pay more for pharmaceutical drugs. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:00 am
#TO4Uber -> Does the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) mandate change to Australian IP law? [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
However, the Canadian provision is not limited to non-profit libraries (think of a commercial digital library that charges subscription fees or an online library archive) and limits the remedies solely to an injunction… . [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/aZq03eBYJm -> Statutory damages for copyright infringement of 20k per wok infringed awarded RE/MAX v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am
Dan Breznitz, in a recent Op-Ed in the Globe and Mail, Trans-Pacific Partnership is a wonderful idea – for China, claims it will “seriously restrict entrepreneurship, diminish competition and limit the basic economic freedom of individuals”. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
, Lawrence Herman, Trans-Pacific Trade and the Intellectual Property Challenge Mark Summerfield, Patents and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:20 pm
Good IP policy is essential to an innovative, independent and competitive Canadian economy. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:12 am
The concept of time limits – which is, itself, imbued with something akin to “sacredness&rdquo [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:24 am
” Since then, Clearly Food resumed manufacturing Clearly Canadian beverages in limited quantities, with bottles of sparkling water sold online. [read post]
4 May 2015, 2:56 pm
Thousands of people die annually in car accidents, but we do not think it’s OK to have a 20kph speed limit. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:27 am
Under NAFTA, pharmaceutical giant Eli Lily, took advantage of this broad definition to target a Canadian court ruling that found one of its patents invalid. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Under such a law, Congress members would have extremely limited powers to debate or amend the terms of this secretive international deal. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/EbWPHCXyiC -> Canadian Appeals Monitor wins Clawbie http://t.co/tNoQ2Siamm -> Why is there a Google Books? [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:06 pm
They’re helping to get it resolved. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/fvUnScKi3P -> Canadian versus U.S. [read post]
