Search for: "In Re Carpenter's Estate" Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2015, 11:54 am by Andrew Delaney
Real-estate agent then asked seller to get an estimate for roof repairs—and seller being a carpenter who’d done most of the work on the place anyway—said the roof was fine as far as he knew, but gave real-estate agent a list of materials that’d be needed to fix the roof, or replace a huge section, or something like that.In the meantime, real-estate agent showed the inn to plaintiffs. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:45 am by Juan C. Antúnez
This lack of certainty is a problem for estate planners and litigators alike. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:07 am by Jeramie Fortenberry
  The most important case on this issue is In re Estate of Carpenter, which identified seven factors help evaluate the issue of active procurement: Presence of the beneficiary at the execution of the will; Presence of the beneficiary on those occasions when the testator expressed a desire to make a will; Recommendation by the beneficiary of an attorney to draw the will; Knowledge of the contents of the will by the beneficiary prior to execution; Giving of… [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:34 am by Juan AntĂșnez
That question was answered in In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1971), in which the Florida Supreme Court reviewed prior case law on active procurement and listed “[s]everal criteria to be considered” in determining active procurement. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 11:03 am by Emma Durand-Wood
Ontario construction law boutique Robson Carpenter (@rc_llp) tweeted news items on Bell’s complaints over lack of condo access, Ontario’s consideration of electronic signatures for real estate deals, Canadian condo market demographics, and Guelph’s condo and apartment project boom. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:34 am
Carpenter of Proskauer Rose in the firm's Privacy Law Blog Re-approval of expired entitlements can track prior CEQA documentation, subject to the substantial change doctrine - Sacramento attorney Katherine J. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 5:45 am by Lee Carpenter
  Lee Carpenter is an Estates & Trusts attorney at the law firm of Offit Kurman, P.A., and can be reached at (410) 209-6426 or Lee.Carpenter@OffitKurman.com. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
 Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 9:31 am by MatadorAdmin
They’re not just for the wealthy or celebrities; they’re for anyone who wants to protect their future and enter their marriage with clear expectations. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 9:31 am by MatadorAdmin
They’re not just for the wealthy or celebrities; they’re for anyone who wants to protect their future and enter their marriage with clear expectations. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
We were also thrilled to help  Okanagan law firm Pushor Mitchell develop and re-launch their new WordPress-based firm website. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:21 am by Juan C. Antúnez
In 1971 the Florida Supreme Court told us in In re: Estate of Carpenter,253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971), that a presumption of undue influence gets triggered if the contestant proves: (1) the existence of a confidential relationship between the testator and the will’s proponent; and (2) the active procurement of the will by the proponent. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Emma Durand-Wood
The real estate lawyers at Frost Law in Toronto retooled the presentation of their Ontario Real Estate FAQ collection. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:26 am by centerforartlaw
She is interested in trusts and estates law and intellectual property law. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am by bndmorris
Re, Personal Precedent at the Supreme Court, 136 Harv. [read post]