Search for: "In Re Case"
Results 281 - 300
of 163,776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2021, 9:37 pm
In Florida, like many other states, the legal doctrine known as res ipsa loquitur exists as a claim that can be brought against defendants in civil tort-related cases. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 6:12 am
You can view or download the case here: In re Beck © 2010, Melinda Deel. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 8:40 am
If you’re a defendant in a Strike 3 Holdings lawsuit, you’re probably curious about resolving your case as soon as possible. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:11 pm
This case therefore involves the fuzzy intersection of the purpose of the exclusionary rule and the retroactive application of new Fourth Amendment case law per United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- Venue in patent cases has been a topic of recent Supreme Court (TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
I truly love appellate advocacy and enjoy reading/analyzing the cases that emanate from our appellate courts. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:37 am
In the case of an irregular (as opposed to a void) appointment of administrators the position was governed by rule 7.55 of the Insolvency Rules 1986. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:06 pm
Also, a new Maryland Re-Entry aka CBAC (see below) initiative is in the works in [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:43 am
Case date: 13 April 2023 Case number: No. 22-1094 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
<> In Re: U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:24 am
“A decision not to bring charges over the fatal shooting of a police officer during a firearms training exercise is be re-examined by prosecutors. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:06 am
Reg. 259/92 continue to apply in this case. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
Maybe they're poor. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:18 pm
"Led by Judge Raggi, the judges who wanted to re-hear the case offered extensive analysis for their position. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am
With Justice Botsford sitting this case out, half of the quorum to hear this case is new. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:24 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Court issued a notice that the quorum of Justices that heard argument in the case did not reach a majority decision, and that the case will be re-argued before the Court as now composed.The composition of the Court has changed significantly since the April 5 argument. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 10:58 am
The post Sixth Circuit re-affirms substantive due process claims may go forward in Flint water cases. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:31 am
The Kentucky trial court, however, denied her motion because the case was referred to binding arbitration. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Back in May, the Chancery Court decided In re Massey. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:51 pm
The caption of this case is In Re Marriage of MacManus. [read post]
