Search for: "In Re Case"
Results 321 - 340
of 163,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2015, 4:00 pm
In a recent case decided by the South Dakota Supreme Court, a sister and brother were co-trustees of a family trust established by the siblings’ parents. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 1:16 am
Case date: 24 February 2022 Case number: No. 20-2205 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:23 am
Courts have been reluctant to apply res ipsa loquitur in fire cases: The rule of res ipsa loquitur is infrequently applied to cases involving fires, and to a lesser extent to explosion cases. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 9:53 am
In most cases, re-homing may be executed by a simple power-of-attorney letter or a notarized statement without government authorities or even any lawyers vetting the new parents. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
In Re: Tableware Antitrust Litigation (No. 04-3514 VRW, N.D. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:11 am
It’s a little bit more rare today than it was in the past, but we work on cases together, but we’re the people in charge of the case. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:26 am
If you are not a Twitter subscriber, you missed these recent TTABlog tweets and re-tweets:RT @_INTA: New INTA website goes live - http://bit.ly/elXxKK - Still waiting for my picture and TTABlog logo to appear.RT @LexisNexis: Top 10 Trademark Cases for the Month of December 2010 http://bit.ly/hl9T3v - Seriously? [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Res judicata applies to cases where the legal issues brought have already been litigated to finality—here, Roberts argued res judicata applied to the Burches’ claims against him because those claims had already been litigated when they were brought against Barrasso earlier. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 6:38 am
In re: M.H. appeared first on Legally Speaking Ohio. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:05 pm
You’re facing some serious charges, and you might be wondering how the prosecution plans to prove their case against you. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 7:28 am
See also In re: Meyer, Case No. 15-13193 (Bankr. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 7:28 am
See also In re: Meyer, Case No. 15-13193 (Bankr. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 8:54 am
On August 31, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of In re: (C.C.S.), (C.L.S.) v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:03 am
Chief Justice Chase's reporter did the same thing for In Re Davis after Chase passed away. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
We’re that nice. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:57 am
Court found that the findings made in the state court judgment did not determine the question of whether debtor’s conduct was “willful and malicious” under § 523(a)(6), and, therefore, declined to apply collateral estoppel to this issue and denied summary judgment on this point.Date of decisions: February 18, 2009 Full opinion click here.Bankruptcy Case Law [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 10:12 am
Bradley: Inter-district remedies struck down unless all districts intentionally violated the Constitution 9:45—Case set II, the 1990s: Effective desegregation remedies could be ended even if the result is re-segregation 14:15—Case set III: Parents Involved in Community Schools ends voluntary racial integration in Seattle and Louisville school districts 15:46—Conclusion: “The results of all of this are tragic…American public schools are… [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:30 pm
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit decided the In re Beineke case recently, affirming a decision by the USPTO's Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences that applicant Walter Beineke was not entitled to a patent for two strains of white oak trees under the Plant Patent Act of 1930 (as last amended in 1954). [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 1:15 pm
However, the recent case of In re Stanford shows that this can be a double-edged sword, having the potential to both undermine an application and to ruin an opinion that could otherwise have shed light on several of the thorniest open questions in patent eligibility jurisprudence. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:50 pm
On October 30, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a landmark decision in In re Bilski. [read post]
