Search for: "In Re Catts" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm by Reference Staff
As their website says: “Whether you’re a lawyer or law student, or you’re just here for the messy legal drama, Strict Scrutiny has you covered. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
R v Sarah Louise Catt [2013] EWCA Crim 1187. (27 September 2012). [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
As the president wages a re-election campaign that polls say he is in danger of losing, his finances are under stress, beset by losses and hundreds of millions of dollars in debt coming due that he has personally guaranteed. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The fruition of that absorption of DP law into Article 8 is apparent in the recent decision of Catt v. [read post]
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
The UK Supreme Court was divided 3-2 in the recent appeal of Re an application by JR 38 for Judicial Review [2015] UKSC 42 on whether the ECHR, art 8, was engaged for a child aged 14 who was suspected of involvement in criminal rioting. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The UK Supreme Court was divided 3-2 in the recent appeal of Re an application by JR 38 for Judicial Review ([2015] UKSC 42) on whether Article 8 ECHR was engaged for a child aged 14 who was suspected of involvement in criminal rioting. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 2:15 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
This is one of several cases before the Supreme Court this term raising issues of privacy and the retention of information by the police (see also R (Catt) and R (T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, and Gaughran v The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland), and it will be interesting to see how the Court approaches art 8 in a variety of policing contexts. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:00 am by Ruth Carter
Rainbow Flag (Photo credit: Rev Dan Catt) Unfortunately, we’re not there yet. [read post]