Search for: "In Re Cawthorn" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2022, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
It was the subject of a recent major Fourth Circuit opinion, and the state of Section 3 litigation is also the subject of a significant new Roger Parloff piece on Lawfare entitled, “After the Cawthorn Ruling, Can Trump Be Saved From Section 3 of the 14th Amendment? [read post]
18 May 2022, 3:30 am
As written, it seems more likely to mean that he had a shot at becoming the youngest person ever elected to Congress.We're prompted to wonder what will Madison Cawthorn do next. [read post]
Voters brought a case against Representative Madison Cawthorn, claiming that Cawthorn was ineligible to run for re-election because of his comments in support of the Capitol attack. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 8:02 am by Josh Blackman
" Cawthorn he currently serves as a Representatives, and has announced his candidacy for re-election. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 4:59 am by Josh Blackman
Voters in North Carolina are seeking to bar Representative Madison Cawthorn from running for re-election to his House seat, and those in Georgia are trying to do the same to Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:05 am by Gerard Magliocca
In Footnote 16, he states that In Re Griffin, a Section Three case decided on circuit by Chief Justice Chase in 1869, is "too... [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance California: “DWP Commissioner Held Fundraiser for Councilmember Koretz in Violation of City Rules” by John Peltz for Knock LA Elections North Carolina: “Cawthorn Insurrection Challenge to Re-election Handed a Setback” by John Holland for Bloomberg Law Ethics National: “Ryan Zinke Broke Ethics Rules While Leading Trump’s Interior Dept., Watchdog Finds” by Anna Phillips and Lisa Rein (Washington Post) for MSN National:… [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 9:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
” North Carolina Congressman Madison Cawthorne has sued to stop a state law inquiry into whether he is disqualified from running for re-election under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment for participating in the Jan. 6 insurrection, not by disputing the facts, but on due process grounds and in reliance on a 1872 law pardoning members of the Confederacy. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 10:53 am
Works that have already been considered for this prize may not be re-submitted. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Cawthorne, 2016 SCC 32 (36466, 36844) It is a constitutional principle that prosecutors not act for improper purposes, such as purely partisan motives, and whether a prosecutor’s purposes are “improper” depends on the facts. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
We’re living now in tragic times. [read post]
25 May 2022, 11:46 am by Katherine Pompilio
The decision will have little to no effect on Cawthorn because he lost his re-election bid in North Carolina’s primary after the case was argued. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
We’re living now in tragic times. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:56 am by Benjamin Pollard
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 10:00 am by Reno Lessard
Merci à Christian Cawthorn, associé et agent de brevets à notre bureau de Montréal et à Joël Tanguay, étudiant en droit, pour leurs contributions respectives à ce billet. [read post]