Search for: "In Re Ch" Results 21 - 40 of 3,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2012, 1:40 am by fboyer
Les chiffres les plus récents du taux de chômage dans tout le pays obtenus auprès du Ministère du Travail entre Juillet 2011 et Juillet 2012, suggèrent que la Floride a probablement une meilleure chance de surmonter son problème de chômage par rapport aux Etats comme la Californie et le Nevada. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:59 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
; and French Wine Company Castel Frères to Pursue Trademark Battle Against Panati in China’s Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 9:19 am
In re Courts plc [2008] EWHC 2339 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 311 “S 176A(2) of the Insolvency Act 1986, which provided that a prescribed part of a company’s net property should be available for the satisfaction of unsecured debts, applied either in its entirety or not at all. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by Meredith Ervine
Ch.; 9/23), the Chancery Court declined a buyer’s request to re-write the terms of a purchase agreement and dismissed its claim that the agreement’s earnout provisions should be reformed based on the doctrine of mistake. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 2:34 am by sally
In re Itau BBA International Ltd [2012] EWHC 1783 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 187 “The definition of ‘existing transferee company’ in regulation 3(1) of the Companies (Cross-Border Mergers) Regulations 2007 was intended to do no more than to exclude from merger by absorption a transferee company formed for the purposes of, or in connection with, a merger by formation of a new company.” WLR Daily, 28th June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
23 May 2008, 2:51 am
In re Federal-Mogul Aftermarket UK Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 1099 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 166 “There was nothing in the rationale underlying the general application of the hindsight principle to contingent debts which should restrict its application to whether there had been an initial triggering event. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 1:47 am
In re Stanford International Bank Ltd and others [2009] EWHC 1441 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 230 “The ‘centre of main interests’ for the purposes of the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 must be identified by reference to factors which were both objective and ascertainable by third parties. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 2:20 am
In re Leeds United Association Football Club Ltd. [2007]  EWHC 1761 (Ch)   “Damages for wrongful dismissal were not payable in priority to other expenses pursuant to para 99(4) to (6) of Sch B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:29 pm
The facts giving rise to a recent Report and Recommendations of the Hearing Board of the Illinois Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission in In re Keck, No. 06 CH 90 (March 6, 2009), shows a primary "warning flag" of a... [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 4:23 pm by Betsy McKenzie
After Hurricane Sandy, Verizon complained that they really did not want to re-install the copper telephone lines that the storm had destroyed along the New York - New Jersey shore. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:33 am by sally
In re Digital Satellite Warranty Cover Ltd and others [2011] EWHC 122 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 28 “A contract for repair or replacement only in the event of breakdown or malfunction which did not oblige the insurer to indemnify the insured for costs which the insured himself incurred fell within para (b) of class 16 Schedule 1 to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:00 am
For families, this year's minimum is $2,200, and increases to $2,300 in 2009.For those so inclined, that means that one can "stuff" more dollars into the loss fund to pre-pay a future expense, or as an additional retirement resource.I know, that's a lot of numbers, but if you own an HSA, they're pretty important. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:59 am by sally
Clark and another v Finnerty and another; In re St George’s Property Services (London) Ltd [2010] EWHC 2538 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 255 “Considerations that the institution of proceedings for relief under s 244 of the Insolvency Act 1986 in respect of a transaction to which the company was a party was extortionate when the issue was only triable and the consequences of thereby rescuing the company less than reasonably practicable were relevant to the existence or otherwise… [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:14 pm
Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Mr David Stone) Re Wong Lo Kat Trade Mark, Multi-Access Ltd v Guanghzhou Wong Lo Kat Great Health Business Development Co Ltd. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:31 am by sally
In re Bezier Acquisitions Ltd [2011] EWHC 3299 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 362 “Rule 2.8 of the Insolvency Rules 1986 did not provide a complete and exhaustive code as to service of a notice of intention to appoint administrators.” WLR Daily, 12th December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]