Search for: "In Re City of Mobile, Petitioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2014, 11:10 am
The arguments Petitioner T-Mobile South, represented at the podium by Jeffrey Fisher, argued that the reasons for a state or local government’s denial of a cell tower application must appear in the same document as the denial itself. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
Petitioner was a Mexican national residing in the City of Leon, Mexico in the State of Guanajuato. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
October 26, 2022 - 11 AM: In re C.E. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:11 pm
New York has a plethora of disparate forfeiture statutes; the Legislature has made no attempt at over-all re-codification or coordination. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
Petitioners John and Irene Yee own the Friendly Hills and Sunset Terrace Mobile Home Parks, both of which are located in the city of Escondido. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
In reaction to the likely operation of marijuana delivery services within the city limits, the council adopted a new ordinance in 2013 that explicitly banned mobile dispensaries. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
Pincus of the Washington, DC office of Mayer Brown LLP represented Petitioner AT&T Mobility, LLC and Deepak Gupta of the Public Citizen Litigation Group in Washington, DC represented Respondents, the Concepcions.) [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Res. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Res. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
You’re out because you missed the base The Yees thought that unnecessary because they thought they touched first base (regulatory takings): Petitioners unquestionably raised a taking claim in the state courts. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:32 pm
Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
” City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
Both cases are expected to be re-listed for the Nov. 20 Conference. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
East Sacramento Partnership for a Livable City v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:33 pm
The petition, City of Moundridgev. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Petitioner challenged the ordinance on CEQA grounds. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Petitioner challenged the ordinance on CEQA grounds. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:54 pm
This occurs only in New York City. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 2014 the Petitioner [Plaintiff] in this case applied to work for the respondent [Employer]. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 2014 the Petitioner [Plaintiff] in this case applied to work for the respondent [Employer]. [read post]
