Search for: "In Re City of Mobile, Petitioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
District Court.1 Our Round Table of Former Immigration Judges filed an amicus brief in support of petitioners’ arguments. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
October 26, 2022 - 11 AM: In re C.E. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 10:44 pm
Sudden stops are common in construction zones, and they’re a tricky move for trucks and buses since they demand a greater stopping distance. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm
Friedland, Digital Architectures of ‘Smart’ Cities and the Fourth Amendment: A Response to Andrew Ferguson, 106 Iowa L. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 2014 the Petitioner [Plaintiff] in this case applied to work for the respondent [Employer]. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 2014 the Petitioner [Plaintiff] in this case applied to work for the respondent [Employer]. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
If a massive phone user tells Verizon, "Stop handling phone service for this unpatriotic advocacy group, or we'll switch our millions of dollars of phone service to T-Mobile instead," I doubt that would justify Verizon's canceling the unpatriotic group's phone lines. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Petitioner challenged the ordinance on CEQA grounds. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Petitioner challenged the ordinance on CEQA grounds. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Res. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
Res. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Russell, for AGAR Corporation, Inc., Petitioner. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 6:13 am
Qualcomm is the commercially biggest patent-related dispute ever (at a minimum, the biggest one in the history of the mobile device industry). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
For example, in In re Morgan, Pryor wrote an opinion holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
In reaction to the likely operation of marijuana delivery services within the city limits, the council adopted a new ordinance in 2013 that explicitly banned mobile dispensaries. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
East Sacramento Partnership for a Livable City v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
” City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
" That's a major win for Samsung and everyone with a balanced position on the issue.I'll now point to all of the amicus briefs filed in the first round (I'll do the same when Apple's backers file later this summer) and sum up what I consider to be their key points.Pro-Samsung brief #1: The Internet Association, The Software & Information Industry Association, Dell, eBay, Facebook, Garmin, Google, HP, Lenovo, Motorola Mobility, Newegg, Pegasystems, Red Hat, SAS… [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:54 pm
This occurs only in New York City. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
There may be licensing requirements for private process servers, as is the case in New York City, Alaska, Arizona, California, Illinois, Montana, Nevada, and Oklahoma. . . .Other jurisdictions, such as Georgia, require a court order allowing a private person to serve process. [read post]
