Search for: "In Re Condemnation of Lands" Results 1 - 20 of 688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2011, 9:28 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Similarly, Ciaglia could have made subsequent submissions that would not be barred by land use res judicata. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:11 pm by Dustin Gallagher
And if you’re a landowner facing condemnation, Sever Storey can help you get fair compensation. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm by Sever | Storey
If you’re a landowner facing condemnation, or a government restriction reduces your land’s value, you need to hire the right attorney. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:27 am by John McFarland
  Denbury sought to condemn an easement across Texas Rice’s land for a pipeline to transport CO2. [read post]
17 May 2018, 12:00 am by Sever | Storey
If you’re a homeowner facing condemnation, you need to hire the right counsel. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:24 am by John McFarland
Denbury has asked the court to re-hear the case, and at least sixteen amicus briefs have been filed. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline project? [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:51 pm by Aimee Hess
The Texas Supreme Court recently decided an important eminent domain case in In Re Lazy W District No. 1, Relator. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:09 pm
Here's what we're reading today:Government to condemn land for Flight 93 memorial - the latest controversy in the land in Somerset, Pennsylvania (photo at left) where United 93 impacted on September 11, 2001. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:30 am by Carlos A. Kelly
I mentioned Representative Campbell's first legislative proposal on this issue in a December 10, 2012 guest post on the ABA's Condemnation, Zoning & Land Use website. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 2:52 pm
C & J Coupe Family Limited Partnership, No. 28882 (Dec. 24, 2008) (and we're not just hailing the case because we're the attorneys for the landowner). [read post]