Search for: "In Re Cox Communications, Inc. Shareholders Litigation" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2010, 2:51 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Applicable Standard of Review The Court applied the unified standard for reviewing controlling stockholder freeze-outs described in the case of In Re Cox Communications, Inc., Shareholders Litigation, 879 A.2d 604 (Del. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:56 am by Broc Romanek
In a challenge to a controlling stockholder's proposed freeze-out transaction (a first-step tender offer followed by a second-step short-form merger), the Court applied a standard derived from In re Cox Communications, Inc. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
Borrowing again from Delaware law, the court explained that “Delaware courts interpreting” a similar statute “have concluded that it provides that only disinterested shareholders votes may be considered” in ratification of a board decision (citing In re Cox Communications, Inc. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:22 pm by Peter B. Ladig
Courts appear to be scrutinizing closely "disclosure only" settlements as part of a Delaware court’s independent duty to ensure that a settlement is fair and reasonable — e.g., the Chancery Court's 2005 opinion In re Cox Communications Inc. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
As articulated in two pre-M&F Worldwide decisions (In re Cox Communications Shareholders Litigation,  and In re MFW Shareholders Litigation, C.A. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm by Francis Pileggi
Those duties depend on the context of the communication, and whether the communication is to an individual stockholder or to a group of stockholders. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
  Instead, this list highlights notable decisions that should be of widespread interest to those who work in the corporate and commercial litigation field or who follow the latest developments in this area of Delaware law. [read post]
By requiring a description of all such litigation, regardless of whether the amount of money involved is itself material, the Commission believes it has given recognition to both the importance of the national environmental policy and the far-reaching effects, both financial and environmental, of violations of environmental laws.[8] Importantly, the SEC also concluded that Congress expected SEC disclosure authority to be used to “require the dissemination of information which is or… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
    For instance, after suffering a cyber-attack, a corporation must not only bear the substantial regulatory and litigation costs associated with potential privacy violations – that is just the tip of the iceberg. [read post]