Search for: "In Re Ctm"
Results 1 - 20
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 7:31 am
A dispute has been brewing for a few months now over the issue of “genuine use” of a European Community Trade Mark (“CTM”) for the purposes of opposing a CTM application. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:53 am
It shouldn’t come as a surprise that this is turning into a complicated mess – the change in the law is seeking to re-write history in relation to 16 years’ worth of CTMs, which is something in the region of 660,000 current registrations.Why not just decide on a mark-per-mark basis? [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
Accordingly Sofaworks both infringed its two CTMs and passed itself off as being associated with Sofa Workshop. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 2:30 am
Additionally, since she joined the company, CTM has consecutively been named to Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Since OHIM is the only body empowered by EU law to examine registration applications and to authorise or refuse registration of a CTM, the lawfulness of Board of Appeal decisions must be assessed solely on the basis of the CTM Regulation. * Carolus's ENGLISH PINK Benelux mark and the CTM it applied for were two legally distinct marks. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 1:53 am
A brief run through the TMView database shows nearly a million CTMs accounting for about 37% of the trade mark coverage of Germany (ie nationals plus CTMs), 64% for UK and 96% for Slovenia, and an OHIM speaker recently reported that about one third of CTM applications are based on class headings. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:22 am
The likelihood of there being upwards of 300,000 class heading CTMs dated before June 2012 gives a measure of how many CTMs could be topped-up into a broader goods/services scope. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
However, now that it is heading on appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) as Case C-622/13 P, it has regained its pristine topicality -- so here it is.In April 2002 Castel Frères applied to register as a Community trade mark (CTM) the word CASTEL for ‘alcoholic beverages (except beers)’ in Class 33; the word was duly registered as a CTM. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 10:36 am
Let your CTMs be narrowed. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
Moroccanoil’s closest registration, a CTM, was under attack at OHIM by a third party (Avon Products) and so any reliance upon it in the IPEC proceedings was torpedoed. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
The owner of the earlier 3D mark claimed likelihood of confusion between its CTM and the design in the sense of Article 9 (1)(b) CTMR. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 7:53 am
There was a happy ending of sorts for the Lithuanian company, though: it finally got a CTM for goods in class 32, this being figurative 'Nueva Melt water original' mark. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:43 am
Seating is limited, so please reply as soon as possible to events@collyerbristow.com if you're hoping to attend. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:52 am
From that perspective, we want to encourage CTMs. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:38 pm
” [Merpel speculates that this will result in more marks sailing through to registration and more troubles once they're granted ...] [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:35 am
AFM has only one pending, opposed CTM application, this being for the word mark AFM. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
Where a CTM is invoked for the purposes of opposing the registration of a national trade mark, if the date of filing of the application for that CTM were to be established by taking account of provisions of national law, that would in effect undermine the uniform nature of the protection of a CTM because the Member States remain free to determine the procedure for filing applications for national trade marks, with the result that the extent of the protection… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:38 am
The Board re-opened the proceeding so that the parties could address that issue. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:59 am
Does anyone know why they spell"harmonisation" with a "z" when the text of the CTM Regulation spells it with an "s"? [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 4:02 am
The main issue before the Appointed Person was whether the answers given by the CJEU to the Appointed Person’s reference questions can be applied to decide CIPA’s appeal, or whether a re-reference to the CJEU may be required. [read post]
