Search for: "In Re David W."
Results 21 - 40
of 1,444
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm
(They could potentially argue that they’re not bound by federal law because they’re Congress and make the law, etc.) [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
An introduction by now retired Associate Justice Stephen Breyer blandly reports the Daubert considerations, without elaboration.[13] The most revealing and important chapter in the Reference Manual is the one on scientific method and procedure, and sociology of science, “How Science Works,” by Professor David Goodstein.[14] This chapter’s treatment is not always consistent. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Christiani,*Richard W. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:47 am
Peavey Electronics Corporation, Cancellation No. 92076586 (November 1, 2023) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
“[W]e must now urgently develop a broad regulatory regime for over-the-counter derivatives. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Justice David Brown, Court of Appeal for Ontario The Hon. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 2:21 am
David Lebovitz has a similar recipe is his useful book Drinking French. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Pinedo, and David A. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Pinedo, and David A. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:52 am
So I think we finally figured out that we’re going to try something. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
Today, we are on the eve of the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention’s entry into force. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
In re Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:07 am
No w? [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 am
He also comments: “[w]hat is clear…is that synodical time will need to be found as a matter of urgency for both discussion and legislation”. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
” Id.; see also In re S.M.S., 196 N.C. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 10:14 am
If we’re not ok with that, think about narrowing the scope of the enforceable right. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:59 am
… “ The Chancellor also commented on the funding issues discussed in §105 and said “[w]hilst the ability of a church to obtain lottery funding may not be as easy now as it might have been when he wrote this article, the principles he suggests remain relevant” [27]. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:40 am
Economics pundit Noah Smith wrote a piece entitled, “The new industrial policy, explained,” in which he notes that “[w]e’re starting to learn what replaces the old free-trade consensus. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:40 am
Economics pundit Noah Smith wrote a piece entitled, “The new industrial policy, explained,” in which he notes that “[w]e’re starting to learn what replaces the old free-trade consensus. [read post]
