Search for: "In Re Davidoff"
Results 81 - 100
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Smith, Who Says You're Disabled? [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
Smith, Who Says You're Disabled? [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Spicy IP), India: Supreme Court on exclusive marketing rights: (Spicy IP), Japan: First induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell patent at Kyoto University: (Competitive Info), Slovenia: Supplementary protection certificates in Slovenia: (The SPC Blog), United States: Biotech/pharma lobbying scoreboard – second quarter update – part II: (Patent Docs), United States: Ferring Pharmaceuticals argues to bring down direct purchaser suits: (Law 360), United States: Transferred… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents - Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am
Francis Pileggi summed it up, as did Kevin LaCroix, Alison Frankel, and Steven Davidoff, Business Law Prof, and some Gibson Dunn lawyers over at the Harvard Law School Forum. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 4:58 pm
Strine’s willingness to skewer fat cats cropped up again yesterday in his opinion in the In re El Paso Corporation Shareholder Litigation case. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:57 pm
KKR Financial Holdings LLC (here) and the Delaware Chancery Court’s January 2016 court decision in the In re Trulia Shareholder litigation (here). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:00 am
And now they’re tied by the bonds of parenthood for the rest of their lives. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Fisch – Steven Davidoff Solomon, Dual Class Stock. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 8:01 am
Davidoff and posted by George R. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Smith, Who Says You're Disabled? [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Smith, Who Says You're Disabled? [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP tango) ECJ sets aside partial refusal to grant CTM for ‘Vorsprung durch Technik’ (progress through technology): Audi AG v OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) (The IP Factor) ECJ: Davidoff criteria for exhaustion apply also if goods were first marketed within the EEA: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV and others v Diesel SpA (JIPLP) Time for a general grumble - General Court decisions missing images, no English version: G-Star Raw Denim kft v OHIM, ESGW Holdings Ltd; and Goncharev v… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:52 pm
As to # 1, Steven Davidoff opines that Hefner has no obligation under delaware law "to sell out to any third party. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Putting together a list of all law faculty blogs and law faculty bloggers is a surprisingly difficult task. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow: (Class… [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
MOOTNESS FEES The Delaware Court of Chancery’s 2016 decision in In re Trulia, Inc. [read post]
