Search for: "In Re Districting for Court of Appeals"
Results 61 - 80
of 15,994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2023, 12:08 pm
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals has suspended a convicted attorney on an interim basis pending final action In re John M. [read post]
1 May 2015, 5:22 am
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals will face a formidable task in reviewing the execrable Worst Report in its disciplinary history when it hears oral argument on June 3, 2015 in the case of In re Szymkovicz et al.... [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
Court of Appeals Rejects Res Ipsa Shortcut in Railroad Worker Injury Case appeared first on Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:25 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 3:10 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:12 am
The case is In re: Ford Motor Company, Case No. 22-0109 (6th Cir.). [read post]
26 May 2022, 5:00 pm
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Thursday held in In re: Apple, Inc. that US District Judge Alan Albright abused his discretion by refusing to transfer a patent infringement lawsuit. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:38 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on Wednesday affirmed the denial of a Republican challenge to Michigan’s new independent commission that will re-draw legislative district boundaries. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:39 pm
The issue in Barrett II was the res judicata effect of a withdrawn appeal from the Juvenile Court, and the panel in that case concluded that the withdrawal had the effect of reviving the prior order of the Juvenile Court and making it the final order for purposes of the res judicata analysis.The Court also cited Austin v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:29 pm
The district court ruled Virginia did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendants but transferred the case to Nebraska federal court, per 28 USC 1406. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 6:06 pm
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta reversed one of my cases on July 31, 2008, and remanded it back to the district court for re-sentencing due to the sentencing judge's failure to specifically follow the dictates of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 2:48 pm
The court found that because the USPTO was not a party to that litigation, issue preclusion could not apply, and therefore the USPTO was not bound by the district court's construction. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:44 pm
OCWD argues that this Court's decision in In re MTBE Prods. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 2:32 pm
The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled 2-1 on Friday that federal district courts lack the authority to release materials from grand juries except where authorized by specific federal rules. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm
The Supreme Court refused Friday to re-instate a federal district court order that extends Texas mail-in voting during the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:09 am
Alan Gold of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida issued a 113 page opinion and order quashing the bankruptcy court's order requiring the lenders involved in TOUSA, Inc.' [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Western District of Texas in December 2018, and in September 2019 the district court... [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:21 pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTINNO. 03-10-00689-CVIn re R. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:00 pm
B216742 (July 13, 2011), the California Court of Appeal (Second District) upheld a lower court decision denying class certification to a group of plaintiffs alleging fraudulent and misleading marketing of universal life insurance policies. [read post]
13 May 2019, 7:28 am
A 200-month sentence imposed on a first-time child pornography offender was thrown out by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday because the judge erroneously assumed that the defendant must have committed a prior sex offense. [read post]
