Search for: "In Re Doyle" Results 81 - 100 of 402
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Texas Supreme Court would likely conclude that Wilmington Trust acted "inconsistently" by rescinding acceleration and then re-accelerating without notice. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am by Cullie Burris
See In Re Grand Jury Investigation, 59 F.3d 17 (2nd Cir. 1995). [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm by Carl Custer
The most recent outbreak from Escherichia coli O157:H7 in romaine lettuce spurred me to pull up an old draft, trim it and post it in an attempt to promote public health. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:09 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance National: “Facebook Fallout Deals Blow to Mercers’ Political Clout” by Nicholas Confessore and David Gelles for New York Times National: “NRA Discloses Two Dozen Additional Contributions from Russian Donors” by Pete Madden and Matthew Mosk for ABC News National: “Ex-Candidates May Face Restrictions on Campaign Cash” by Ken Doyle for Bloomberg Government Missouri: “Missouri Defends Campaign Donation Limits in Eighth… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:26 am by Katharine Trendacosta
In the House of Representatives, that means supporting Representative Mike Doyle’s bill, which has 150 co-sponsors. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Sovereign Immunity, Absolute Immunity, Qualified Immunity, Use Immunity, Transaction Immunity and Qualified Privilege claims that may be advanced by public officers and employees involved in litigation and, or, administrative hearingsBelow is an example of the material posted on NYPPL. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:37 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Both in Ohio, incompetence capital of the nation.And so, after beating back Roy Moore (who's demonstrably not anti-semitic, says his wife, because "one of our attorneys is a Jew") and sending Doug Jones to Washington . . . .Doyle Lee HammThey're getting set to kill Doyle Lee Hamm in February. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 9:53 am by Green, Schafle & Gibbs
Specifically, we’re looking for schemes or abuses that might be more far-reaching than the individual cases brought through the FINRA arbitration process.FINRA Firms & Brokers, Fined & SanctionedSpartan Securities Group, Ltd.Without admitting or denying the allegations, the firm consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it failed to establish and implement an appropriate anti-money laundering (AML) program related to its business of accepting low-priced… [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 6:18 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance Use of Campaign Money for Lawmakers’ Security Requested by Kenneth Doyle for Bloomberg BNA Alabama: Civil Penalties Now in Place for Late or Inaccurate Campaign Reports by Mike Cason for AL.com California: California Democrats Out to Reverse Another Election Rule to Help One of Their Own by Taryn Luna for Sacramento Bee District of Columbia: “Publicly Financed Campaigns in D.C. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:34 am by Jonathan Spontarelli
Federal: ‘Soft Money’ Rules Upheld by Supreme CourtBloomberg BNA – Kenneth Doyle | Published: 5/23/2017 The U.S. [read post]
21 May 2017, 6:28 pm
Bennett Capers's Re-Reading Alafair Burke's The Ex, also on SSRN, is a contribution to the same NELR Symposium. [read post]
21 May 2017, 6:26 pm by Christine Corcos
Bennett Capers's Re-Reading Alafair Burke's The Ex, also on SSRN, is a contribution to the same NELR Symposium. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:18 am by Jim Sedor
DOJ Deflects Calls for More Foreign Agents Act TransparencyBloomberg BNA – Kenneth Doyle | Published: 5/11/2017 Watchdogs are calling for the U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
However, he declined to grant injunctions requiring Facebook either to remove the posts or to prevent the material in them from being re-posted, on the grounds that Facebook could rely on the defence of innocent publication in section 27 of the Defamation Act 2009 (also here). [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 4:31 am by SHG
It deserves better, and you’re capable of better. [read post]