Search for: "In Re Dworkin"
Results 1 - 20
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2013, 3:58 am
Cass Sunstein (Harvard) gives a nice re-statement of those aspects of Dworkin's views that made him such an appealing figure in modern constitutional theory. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:43 pm
Dworkin enviudó en 2000. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 3:58 am
"Perhaps it’s simply because we’re in a moment of crisis, when people seeking solutions are dusting off all sorts of radical ideas. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 4:27 am
I was the founding co-editor of the Harvard Law Review Forum, and for our very first issue, I solicited a response from Professor Dworkin to Fred Schauer's (Re)Taking Hart. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:10 pm
Consequently, when looking at how judges decide cases, we should take them at their word when they tell us they're decide cases in a way that is coherent with what comes before, is morally correct, and represents the one true "right" answer as a matter of law. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:15 pm
I am informed that Ronald Dworkin was said to have turned down a clerkship at the American Supreme Court after having clerked with Judge Hand: a gentle reminder that the forum’s status can only matter so much when we go to measure a person’s contributions to the development of the law. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 5:30 am
Moreover, in the quest to re-characterize all of these rights as supporting democracy, there is the danger that we will distort their most valuable features. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Moreover, in the quest to re-characterize all of these rights as supporting democracy, there is the danger that we will distort their most valuable features. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:15 am
Here is the abstract: After Dworkin's critiques of the work of H.L.A. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
In my two previous essays (here and here) on last week's oral arguments in Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Vermeule describes a concept that is inherently anti-utilitarian, anti-aggregative, and concerned first and foremost with the res publica. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:16 am
”Dworkin, Andrea. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:29 am
"Re-Engineering Human Biology: What Should be the Ethical and Legal Limits? [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:37 pm
Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard 1978) p. 31. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
We're far from the world in which such assumptions would hold, in multiple dimensions.There are a few main reasons why the two sets of theories converge to a degree. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 9:28 pm
Even if you're caught red-handed - hell, even if you take the police to the body - you might still walk. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 9:14 am
So I have to twist around to find some way to say that your views ought not to govern political decisions, without having to say that they're false. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
It isn’t abnegation for the law to stand by and let someone do what they’re entitled to do. [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:00 am
Ho, Confucian Jurisprudence, Dworkin, and Hard Cases, (Washington University Jurisprudence Review, Vol.10.1, Forthcoming).From SmartCILP:Michael Scaperlanda, Scalia's Short Reply To 125 Years of Plenary Power, 68 Oklahoma Law Review 119-136 (2015).Symposium: Christianity and Human Rights. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:11 am
Dworkin and MacKinnon said that women had eroticized domination. [read post]
