Search for: "In Re Dworkin"
Results 41 - 60
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2009, 3:40 pm
If we're going to take Dworkin's overwrought metaphor literally, we'd have to say that in 1976, the justices were democracy's kidnappers, the goons responsible for turning over the bound prisoner to big money. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 6:58 am
All you need to do is to look at the cover of the current issue of NYU’s magazine, with its “Dworkin on Dworkin” cover, and, at least if you’re in the legal academy, you’d see what I mean by law porn. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Throughout the book Vermeule notes his intellectual debt to Ronald Dworkin. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:42 pm
(2) Relatedly, I personally am reasonably confident that we know today that some version of a “social fact” account of law is better than purely normative accounts of a sort associated, for the last generation, with Ronald Dworkin. [read post]
12 May 2007, 6:18 am
" Many readers of LTB will be familiar with Leiter's work, but if you are not and you are interested in contemporary analytic jurisprudence (Hart, Raz, Dworkin, etc.), then you really will want to explore Leiter's arguments about the implications of Quine for the method of contemporary jurisprudence. [read post]
VIBRATORS ARE POPPING UP EVERYWHERE: “For years, vibrators were bought quietly in sex shops, and la…
21 Apr 2011, 7:25 pm
But what is this “sex conservatism of the ’80s” they’re talking about? [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 11:02 am
So actually, I don't think we're dealing with - and indeed we cannot be dealing with - a simple reversion to charismatic authority, even Dworkin has judges who he doesn't like (especially as he's from the US) Indeed, to my mind, anyone that reads Dworkin cannot help but notice that he really, really sounds like a liberal-Schmittian (I know the term sounds like a contradiction in terms, but read him and you'll see what I mean), simply putting a… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
Critics argue that Nixon waged a jurisprudential “counter-revolution” against the Warren Court that eventually “failed” (Dworkin 1972; Blasi 1983). [read post]
14 May 2007, 9:49 am
Hint: They’re somewhere between “Nietzsche” and “Auschwitz. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:15 pm
Put another way, we're exhibiting classic herding behavior by collectively beating a few horses to death. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:40 am
On this as on many other matters, re-reading my much missed late colleague Ronnie Dworkin is very instructive. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:04 am
She pursues her goal by re-casting the constitutional theories of Keith Whittington, Ronald Dworkin, and Derrick Bell as romance, comedy, and tragedy. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 2:53 pm
All you need to do is to look at the cover of the current issue of NYU's magazine, with its "Dworkin on Dworkin" cover, and, at least if you're in the legal academy, you'd see what I mean by law porn. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 1:45 am
One can disagree with any of those decisions, but Kennedy's colleagues are not less activist; they're just more predictably ideological.2) As I said, I'll give Rosen this one. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:45 pm
Last weekend I attended a talk by Kade Dworkin to business students on social media strategies for companies. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:58 am
That's true even if, as is generally the case, they're ridiculously fulsome, as long as they're also informative. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 5:37 am
And the new Dworkins nail it down. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm
It is, I think, telling that Dworkin has, with the exception of a never-reprinted book review in the Times Literary Supplement of Robert Cover’s Justice Accused, never truly addressed the issue of slavery. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 4:37 am
They're not generally run by state courts. [read post]
23 Sep 2006, 8:41 pm
For those of you who follow the LOAC technicalities, Bobby Chesney at National Security Advisors put up a useful quick guide to the compromise detainee bill, and in the course of that discussion asked whether the narrowing language of the bill could be seen to put the US in violation of its GPW article 129 obligation to enact penal legislation re the conventions.Geoff Corn responds in one of the comments that article 129 requires the condition of an international armed conflict, under CA2,… [read post]
