Search for: "In Re El Paso Corporation Shareholder Litigation" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2016, 8:00 am by Jason M. Halper
” Board actions that may affect the shareholder franchise or touch upon matters of corporate control may fare better under enhanced scrutiny review if undertaken “on a clear day. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am by Carl Neff
The amendments also do not apply to alternative business entities not governed by the DGCL, such as partnerships, limited partnerships or limited liability companies, as in In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, LP Derivative Litigation, C.A. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am by Carl Neff
The amendments also do not apply to alternative business entities not governed by the DGCL, such as partnerships, limited partnerships or limited liability companies, as in In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, LP Derivative Litigation, C.A. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:50 am by Edward M. McNally
Hence, as in In re El Paso Shareholder Litigation, the court may refuse to enjoin the merger even if there is evidence of wrongdoing in the merger negotiations. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
   The court also recognized that, despite the payment of an adequate price for El Paso, shareholders may nonetheless have been harmed by this type of conflict. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  "The injunction the plaintiffs posit would be one that would sanction El Paso in breaching many covenants in the Merger Agreement and that would bring about facts that would mean that El Paso could not satisfy the conditions required for Kinder Morgan to have an obligation to close. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Michael Sirkin
Target boards are no longer subject to shareholder discipline because the acquirer will buy out the target’s shareholders. [read post]