Search for: "In Re Engelhardt"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
They're not supposed to smoke. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am
Two days after Judge Ezra’s injunction, on Saturday, March 2, a three-judge “motions” panel of the Fifth Circuit (Judges Clement, Engelhardt, and Ramirez) granted a stay by a 2-1 vote , but in a way that was itself complicated. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:43 am
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0752-x Buber, I., & Engelhardt, H. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Engelhardt, the same panel that decided the original case. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
A Fifth Circuit panel consisting of Judges Priscilla Richman, James Ho, and Kurt Engelhardt affirmed Hanen’s ruling. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
From yesterday's Fifth Circuit order in In re Mesaros, decided by Judges Edith Brown Clement, Kurt Engelhardt, and Andrew Oldham: Respondents allege that on October 30, 2020, they were travelling through Texas in a Biden-Harris tour bus. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am
And that opinion was written by–so we're told–one of the biggest hacks in the judiciary: Judge Jim Ho. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” Thirteen judges agreed with the conclusion though twelve (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reversed on lenity grounds while eight members (Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson) reversed on the ground that federal law unambiguously fails to cover non-mechanical bump stocks. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
A bump stock is a firearm attachment that allows a shooter to harness the natural recoil of a semi-automatic weapon to quickly re-engage the trigger after firing, enabling him to shoot at an increased rate of speed. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
The decision was written by Fifth Circuit Chief Judge Priscilla Richman and joined by Judges Kurt Engelhardt and James Ho. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm
The majority opinion was written by Judge Jones, and was joined by Chief Judge Richman and Judges Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Southwick, Haynes, Costa, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:20 am
That line of reasoning was supported by two of the three panel judges (former Chief Judge Stewart, and Judge Engelhardt), while Judge Ho would have affirmed the district court ruling, according to which Conti had Article III standing, but no antitrust standing and no Sherman Act claims (neither under Section 1 nor Section 2). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:01 am
But you're not gonna drive on the left side of the road, and you're not gonna impose Sharia law. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 6:00 am
Engelhardt in which he noted the misconduct in the AUSO. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
Engelhardt found that the plaintiff was not a seaman entitled to pursue a Jones Act claim. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
Engelhardt found that the plaintiff was not a seaman entitled to pursue a Jones Act claim. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
Engelhardt found that the plaintiff was not a seaman entitled to pursue a Jones Act claim. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:08 pm
Engelhardt found that the plaintiff was not a seaman entitled to pursue a Jones Act claim. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm
Judges Elrod and Engelhardt found that (1) the Plaintiffs have standing, (2) the individual mandate was unconstitutional, but (3) remanded for further proceedings on severability. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Engelhardt, and Carolyn Dineen King. [read post]
