Search for: "In Re Estate of Anders"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 6:27 am
Here at Blawgconomics we have for some time been strong proponents of the idea that the real estate investment trust (REIT) regime in the United States could be Utilized, with a few minor adjustments, to stimulate the development of solar infrastructure in the country. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:45 am
The court also reminds us what an Anders brief should really be: “Anders equates a frivolous appeal with one that presents issues lacking an arguable merit. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:37 am
Courts traditionally presume that commercial parties are on more of an equal playing field and are more sophisticated concerning commercial real estate transactions, since both parties will usually have attorneys to review their documents. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:37 am
Courts traditionally presume that commercial parties are on more of an equal playing field and are more sophisticated concerning commercial real estate transactions, since both parties will usually have attorneys to review their documents. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:24 pm
Image courtesy of Flickr and Anders Ljungberg. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 12:41 pm
We’re not wired to operate in financial markets. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
Odell Anders v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
But the ABA quickly re-wrote the regulations to increase disclosure and close loopholes. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:36 am
" In re NYSE Specialists Securities Litigation, 503 F.3d 89 (2007): In this case, the Second Circuit considered a lawsuit brought against, inter alia, the New York Stock Exchange, alleging that the NYSE had failed to adequately police the seven firms through which stock trades are funneled. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:23 am
“We’re all on the same conveyor belt. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
