Search for: "In Re Estate of Du Pont" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2010, 3:18 am by Paul Caron
John Eleuthère du Pont, an heir to the du Pont chemical fortune, is the latest plutocrat to hit the estate tax lottery by dying yesterday at the age of 72 (in prison where he was serving his sentence imposed for his conviction of third degree murder in the 1996 shooting... [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:36 am
Appellant Charger challenged the Board's factual findings on five Du Pont factors, but the CAFC ruled that the Board's decision was supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 7:51 pm
Last February we had the entertainingly sordid story of the Sharon Freebery, the local Delaware bigwig who took $2.3 million from a Du Pont heiress who, by coincidence, happened to have a major real estate project pending approval from Freebery's local government. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 4:34 am
As to real estate purchases, however, the Board did recognize that some degree of care is exercised, and therefore to that extent this factor favored Applicant.Considering all of the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found confusion likely.TTABlog comment: Well, this case illustrates nicely why the Board's treatment of third-party registration evidence is so annoying to practitioners. [read post]
30 May 2019, 3:28 am
In re Talyoni, LLC, Serial No. 87695323 (May 28, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
Opposer should have indicated which web page or group of web pages within each exhibit support each specific du Pont factor. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:00 am by Janet Lindenmuth
In 1802 he sold the house and mills to Eleuthère Irénée du Pont, who founded his gunpowder mills there. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:18 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
Thus, the Board determined the first du Pont factor weights in favor of finding a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:13 am
"Applying the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found that Stawski's addition of the nondistinctive geographic elements, “RIDGE” and “ESTATE,” to the registered mark PROSPER did not diminish the strong similarity between the marks. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:04 am
" The specific goods are related in "cumulative ways," and therefore this du Pont factor favored Opposers.As to trade channels and conditions of sale, the Board noted Opposers' testimony that the goods would be purchased by the same customers in the same stores. [read post]