Search for: "In Re Estate of Greenspan"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2015, 7:05 pm
Germanled euro austerity measures against Greece thus may need to be re-thought as the long-suffering Greeks consider their emerging opportunity to switch to a new economic sponsor and/or currency. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:15 pm
If we’re striving for immortality, the expiration date should be eternity. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
” (E.g., Wells on Black and Greenspan). [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 3:05 pm
In both In re Estate of Longeway and In re Estate of Greenspan, the Court found expansive implied authority for guardians conferred in the Act. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:06 am
Even Alan Greenspan, who some no doubt consider the father of our rich-poor income gap, and who is certainly no bleeding heart liberal, has said, “The income gap between the rich and the rest of the US population has become so wide, and is growing so fast, that it might eventually threaten the stability of democratic capitalism itself. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am
That’s because 1950 is the year that our country started keeping such data, and since then our recessions and recoveries have tended to be shaped like a ‘V,’ while the one we’re in is more likely going to look like an ‘L’ followed by a ‘W’. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
Hansson has to be Greenspan-ian. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:44 pm
The idea that you cannot reimpose a decent estate tax on the estates of the wealthiest 2% in the country, to assist with meeting the heartfelt needs of the struggling middle and lower classes, is pathetic. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:56 am
At the beginning of the financial crisis, economists worried that the United States would end up like Japan after its real estate bubble burst in the late 1980s. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:55 am
At the beginning of the financial crisis, economists worried that the United States would end up like Japan after its real estate bubble burst in the late 1980s. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:29 am
No, I guess they’re not. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:57 pm
(They were counting on real estate prices to keep rising, and at least implicitly on a bailout if things turned ugly, NOT on appropriate pricing of credit risks.)No, what's wonderful about it is that Greenspan asserted it in the complete absence of any supporting evidence. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:24 am
No, Greenspan and Bernanke either… nope… that’s all… thanks, bye. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:46 am
You see, up until that July 10th, all that was happening was that our housing bubble had started to deflate, largely due to the efforts of the Greenspan’s and then Bernanke’s Federal Reserve. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 1:06 pm
Something else: they're impressively incomplete in their coverage. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:11 am
(NOTE TO THE READER: If that last sentence made any sense at all to you, please go back and re-read it.) [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 12:47 am
It seems we're developing a whole new and interesting relationship with the rule of law in this country. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:54 am
The federal estate tax returns at the 2001 levels. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:59 am
His name was Alan Greenspan. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 11:45 am
For example, some like to blame Alan Greenspan for keeping interest rates too low for too long, but this argument is kind of nutty, in my view, because while it may or may be true that interest rates helped fuel the real estate bubble from a demand perspective, low rates certainly didn’t cause the crisis. [read post]
