Search for: "In Re Estate of Kant"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2014, 6:45 am
” In re Estate of Kant, 265 So.2d 524, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
But did favor accused infringers sometimes: Fourth Estate v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
It gave McIntyre a life-long interest in the subject in general and a particular fondness for Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.[7] Given this deep affinity between philosophy and law, one might expect to see explicit references to the major philosophers in the decisions written by judges.[8] This study discusses the extent to which this is true. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 6:12 am
By definition, humans can’t have a utility/use as per Kant; Thirteenth Amendment. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:29 am
– Job 41:11 (Authorized Version) It’s said that the Lisbon earthquake and tsunami of 1755 had a profound effect on the thought of Voltaire, Rousseau, Kant, and others. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 3:20 am
There is a campaign to re-open nominations cos #notfair. [read post]
