Search for: "In Re Estate of Starr"
Results 41 - 60
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm
The further administrative proceedings to deal with the petitioner’s appeal did not re-commence the statutory period to file a CEQA challenge. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
Invoking the protections of res judicata, collateral estoppel and the requirement to exhaust administrative remedies as analyzed in Ione Valley Land, Air, & Water Defense Alliance, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 12:44 pm
Kasowitz comes from the rough and tumble world of New York real estate litigation. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:14 am
They’re benefiting from a tidal wave of interest. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 3:24 am
His second-in-command, Colonel Sandurz, says, “You’re looking at now, sir. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:48 am
If you're having troubles voting, please shoot me an email and let me know and I can help you. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
CEQA Litigation/Procedural Issues Various of California’s District Courts of Appeal rendered notable decisions on a number of issues relating to the procedures and rules governing the conduct of CEQA litigation, including the following holdings: Res judicata will not apply to bar a subsequent action on the same claim between the same parties unless the first judgment was on the merits. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
These firms are allegedly complicit in the scheme as they are willing to submit false CEQA reports for improper purposes. (8/7/19 Order re Motion to Dismiss, at 1:20-2:17.) [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 11:29 am
The City therefore recirculated a completely re-vamped revised draft EIR (RDEIR) in the form of a “project EIR” which essentially “replaced” the prior program EIR. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:40 am
The goal is to “re-envision and revitalize” the neglected Parnassus campus to retain UCSF’s status as a leading and “world-renowned medical complex, research center, and professional school. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:04 pm
(CEQA Guidelines, § 15124; In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1175.) [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Another recent appellate decision held CEQA’s statutes of limitations run from the agency’s initial project approval, and the period to bring suit is not re-opened by subsequent approvals that are simply steps to implement the already-approved project. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 1:21 pm
” (Citing and quoting from In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated Proceedings (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1163-1166.) [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
(While the opinion notes the trial court rejected Respondents’ and Real Parties’ “various procedural defenses” – which were not specified in the opinion, but which in fact included statute of limitations, mootness, and res judicata/collateral estoppel – the Court of Appeal expressly declined to reach these issues, stating in a footnote: “We need not address the Ohlsons’ various procedural defenses because we affirm the trial… [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
., §§ 15161, 15168, 15385, 15152), and relied heavily on what it found to be an analogous Supreme Court decision – In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143 – which held that specific details about a second-tier project (the Environmental Water Account, or EWA) that were released shortly before certification of the first-tier PEIS/R for the CALFED Program need not have been included in the PEIS/R. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:40 am
Against the backdrop of another severe drought, water supply and impact issues continue to be points of contention for water agencies, water users, conservation groups, and the state. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
In December 2014, it notified LandWatch it had additional documents it would mail upon receiving $34.80 in costs, but LandWatch did not request these documents until March 2015, at which time District had to re-gather them, and they were produced in April 2015. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
Starr, we're familiar with the facts. [read post]
