Search for: "In Re Ethics Opinion No. 74-28"
Results 21 - 25
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
RSutch@dscpas.com (27) @JodyPadarCPA – Jody Padar – Tax Quickbooks CPA Adjunct Professor Xero Firm Partner Sage Networker MACPA Professional Speaker Accounting Today Freshbooks The Radical CPA (28) @JohnRDundon – John R. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Already, some asset managers have expressed concern that the influx of shareholder proposals are not resulting in a corresponding increase in enterprise value.[28] Instead, these asset managers noted the proposals’ high level of prescriptiveness, lack of connection to material risks or long-term value, and decreased overall quality.[29] Thus, it is not surprising that the average percentage of votes cast “for” proposals declined from 36% in 2021 to 24% in 2023.[30]… [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
California, 543 U.S. 499 (2005).........60In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436 (1890) ............... 2, 32 viiLaGrand v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
"28. [read post]
