Search for: "In Re Florida Appellate Rules"
Results 121 - 140
of 977
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2019, 8:12 am
In Re Estate of Black, 528 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); In Re Estate of Vernon, 608 So.2d 510 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
D., IN RE: THE MATTER OF TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS FOR THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF A MINOR CHILD, Appellee. 1st District. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:29 pm
This week’s recap examines a recent appellate ruling that provides a nice roadmap for arguing a plaintiff’s theory of damages cannot satisfy Rule 23’s predominance requirement, as well as another district court’s efforts to parse out the contours of standing based on statutory violations post-Spokeo. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
Florida real estate = Florida law: “No choice-of-law rule has earlier vintage, or greater longevity, than the rule that issues directly pertaining to real property are governed by the law of the situs of the property. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:30 pm
It started by noting that the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure do not require courts to dismiss cases on request, but merely make it possible. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 8:15 am
American then sued Southern for bad faith insurance – prevailing in trial court, and then more recently in the appellate court in a 3-0 ruling. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
HIGGINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:14 am
In what could be a ground breaking decision, for the very first time we now have a Florida appellate decision explicitly sanctioning the use of trust protectors in a domestic trust proceeding. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
At least one appellate court has held it cannot. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 8:07 am
No, said the appellate court: "Res judicata is a judicial doctrine used to bar parties from relitigating claims previously decided by a final adjudication on the merits. [read post]
5 Jun 2021, 3:17 pm
As of June 21, 2021, at 12:01 AM courts in Florida are back baby! [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
PEARSON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
The court under this rule may not extend the time for serving a motion for rehearing or to enlarge any period of time governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:41 am
Herpel re-delivered the mantel a month later. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:41 am
Herpel re-delivered the mantel a month later. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:14 am
Put another way, the court gave the plaintiff a chance to dismiss the other case and provide documentation that the Florida decision would be res judicata. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm
Espejo-Norton, a 2008 3d DCA case I wrote about here, the usual rule in Florida is that an estate won’t be reopened even if a rightful heir was excluded. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:49 pm
That issue, on which the 4th DCA had the first word among Florida appellate courts in its 2011 decision in Kingsway Amigo Insurance Company v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 2:18 pm
And when the decision will doubtless be appealed, the appellate courts will be focused on this twist of Florida state constitutional law, as well as on this specific clear-and-convincing-evidence provision. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:38 am
The Florida Supreme Court denied review. [read post]
