Search for: "In Re Florida Rules of Crim. Procedure"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2016, 5:39 am
See, In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 199 So.3d 867 (Fla. 2016). [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:39 am
See, In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 199 So.3d 867 (Fla. 2016). [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am
You can find below the information from the LSA program re: our little gathering on crim law and crim procedure. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 12:34 am
Jones in 2012 and Florida v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
See, Florida Criminal Practice and Procedure 3.5 and cases like State ex Rel. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:17 pm
Crim. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
Crim. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
Crim. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
In re: Jeffrey Beard, et.al. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Crim. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
One defendant's sentence is remanded for resentencing where the district court committed prejudicial procedural error by calculating his advisory guideline range incorrectly. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Crim. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Hall, No. 09–5731 In a capital habeas matter, the petition for certiorari is granted and the court of appeals' order is vacated and remanded where the court of appeals incorrectly held that the habeas petition, which claimed that petitioner was denied discovery into the issue of whether there had been improper communications between the judge and jury, was procedurally barred based on an insufficient record, contrary to Cone v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Hall, No. 09–5731 In a capital habeas matter, the petition for certiorari is granted and the court of appeals' order is vacated and remanded where the court of appeals incorrectly held that the habeas petition, which claimed that petitioner was denied discovery into the issue of whether there had been improper communications between the judge and jury, was procedurally barred based on an insufficient record, contrary to Cone v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Igbokwe, No. 07-1513 Defendant's convictions and sentence for health care fraud, currency structuring, and money laundering are affirmed where: 1) the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions; and 2) any error in calculating the loss for the health care fraud conviction would have been harmless because the sentence was based on defendant's currency structuring conviction under the guideline grouping rules, rather than on his health care fraud conviction. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Crim. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Crim. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Crim. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Orsburn, No. 07-2584, 07-2585 Convictions for mail fraud are affirmed, but the sentences vacated and the case remanded for re-sentencing where the trial court applied the wrong Guidelines sentence when it concluded that embezzling money from the government fell under section 2C1.1 of the Guidelines which covers frauds that incl [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Mejia, No. 052856, 056683, 061744 Convictions for conspiracy to commit assaults with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence are vacated where: 1) the testimony of the Government expert witness violated the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment; and 2) that error was not harmless. [read post]
