Search for: "In Re Frickey"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2010, 8:52 pm
Thanks to Brian, I just came across the terribly sad news of Phil Frickey's terribly unripe passing. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 11:22 am
Robert Post (Yale Law School) has posted Theorizing Disagreement: Re-Conceiving the Relationship between Law and Politics (California Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 4:08 pm
If you’re not a member of the Federal Bar Association’s Indian Law Section, there’s still time to join. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am
”197 After Worcester, the Indian canon lay dormant in federal case reports until the Supreme Court invoked it again thirty-four years later in In re Kansas Indians, where the Court applied the canon to a treaty exempting certain Miami Indian lands from taxation.198 I found only two other nineteenth century cases invoking the canon.199 Given the paucity of nineteenth century cases applying the canon, twentieth century courts perhaps overstated the case when they… [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
Frickey, "From the Big Sleep to the Big Heat: The Revival of Theory in Statutory Interpretation,” Minnesota Law Review 77:241-267 (1992). 2. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
Frickey,From the Big Sleep to the Big Heat: The Revival of Theory in Statutory Interpretation,[106]Minnesota Law Review 77:241-267 (1992)* * * * * * __________Stephen Breyer,“On the Uses of Legislative History in Interpreting Statutes,”65 S. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
The brief was signed by 16 professors, including Akhil Amar, Richard Fallon, Dan Farber, Phil Frickey, Sandy Levinson, Judith Resnick, Kathleen Sullivan, and Laurence Tribe. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
Cunningham, et al. as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Neither Party, In Re: Donald J. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
He liked to say that you’re entitled to your own opinion, but not to your own facts. [read post]
