Search for: "In Re Gildea" Results 1 - 20 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2012, 7:25 am by Eric Schweibenz
”  Accordingly, ALJ Gildea found that Respondents’ request that Nonparty re-produce the EMS document had merit, and would be granted if it were properly before the ALJ. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 pm by Eric Schweibenz
”  Additionally, ALJ Gildea held that at least some of the Accused Products had downloaded the allegedly infringing features prior to being sent abroad for repair; therefore, the alleged infringement did in-fact occur before Cablevision re-imported the Accused Products. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:58 pm by Alex Gasser
As an initial matter, ALJ Gildea ordered Complainants to re-file revised public versions of all three settlement agreements because two were so heavily redacted that the requirement to file non-confidential versions was rendered “meaningless,” and the third agreement was not submitted at all. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:18 am by Eric Schweibenz
  He suggested that if the Commission finds a violation they should require the parties to re-submit arguments on bond. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:36 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Since the threshold showing was not met by Respondents, ALJ Gildea did not discuss the Complainant’s timeliness arguments, but urged Respondents to consider this issue when deciding whether to re-file their motion. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:04 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The ALJ thus denied Apple’s request, and similarly denied its alternative request that discovery be re-opened and the hearing date extended to address the new infringement contentions. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:58 am by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued Order No. 15 in Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Controls Technology (Inv. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:54 pm by Alex Gasser
Patent Nos. 7,844,915 (“the ‘915 patent”); 7,469,381; 7,084,859 (“the ‘859 patent”); RE 42,738 and 7,920,129 (“the ‘129 patent”) (collectively, “the asserted patents”). [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:50 pm by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 12 (dated December 3, 2010), denying Respondent Apple Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:29 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  ALJ Gildea further noted that if “Respondents choose to re-file this motion as a motion to compel, Respondents should address in their motion whether, under the present circumstances, the Administrative Law Judge has the authority to compel nonparty Mr. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:49 am by Eric Schweibenz
  After Apple re-filed its notice of prior art, Samsung filed a second motion to strike arguing that Apple’s amended notice violated the criteria set forth in Order No. 40. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 9:40 am
We're so used to referring to her by her married name only that we momentarily forgot her admirable Scandinavian roots.We know Justice Gildea would never stoop to this, but it reminded us of the mini-flap a few years ago when, during her campaign for State Auditor, the candidate heretofore known as Pat Awada suddenly became Pat Anderson Awada. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:07 pm by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued Order No. 40 granting-in-part Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (collectively, “Samsung”) motion to strike Respondent Apple Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 10:19 am
If we are going to stick with the election system for choosing judges in Minnesota, perhaps it's time to re-evaluate that requirement. [read post]