Search for: "In Re Gorsuch" Results 1 - 20 of 1,067
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
., that Idaho law forbids some emergency abortions that in the reasonable medical judgment of doctors, are necessary to avert substantial health risks and therefore that EMTALA requires be made available in Idaho hospital ERs.Another preliminary obstacle was raised by Justice Gorsuch. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 2:43 pm by Mark Tushnet
So, we’re supposed to think that the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 In truth, they're best understood to stand for this far-more-modest proposition, which appears in the 1995 OLC opinion on which Trump places the most weight:  “[A] statute that does not by its express terms apply to the President may not be applied to the President if doing so would raise a serious question under the separation of powers. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am by Guest Author
  However, the case would give Justice Gorsuch a chance to more fully connect the federalism canon and MQD (as he began to do in West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm by Michael C. Dorf
"We're writing a rule for the ages," he humbly offered.In principle, that's legitimate. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
“We’re writing a rule for the ages,” Justice Neil Gorsuch says. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:28 am by Ronald Mann
” In the same vein, when Raynor continued to push for judicial deference to the NLRB’s views, Justice Neil Gorsuch quipped: “What’s wrong with the best judgment a neutral magistrate can issue? [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:11 am
If they intend to obstruct and we're able to show that they knew that was wrongful conduct with consciousness of wrongdoing, then, yes, that's a 1512(c)(2) offense and then we would charge that.That's the end of the Gorsuch/Prelogar colloquy, and Gorsuch has made his point strongly. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Because Justice Gorsuch, writing for the Court in the infamous S. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 10:15 am by Ronald Mann
For example,  Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson commented that she was “trying to figure out whether the proceeds of the life insurance are really going out when they’re being used to redeem the shares. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by Guest Author
If you can’t set aside the rule and you’re not a regulated party, how is their injury redressable in this suit and why do they have standing? [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
And I think what Justice Gorsuch is saying,” Kagan continued, “is that that has got to be wrong. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:06 am
"Asked Neil Gorsuch, at oral argument yesterday, quoted in "Supreme Court debates whether Texas councilwoman who says her arrest was politically motivated can sue the mayor" (CNN).The case is Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:33 am by SHG
As we’re regularly reminded these days, no one is above the law, including a councilwoman targeted by a unpleasant mayor. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am by Ronald Mann
… [W]hat you’re suggesting to us is that they don’t have a right to say the plan is violating a bunch of other provisions of the Code … I’ve just never heard of parsing standing in that way. [read post]