Search for: "In Re Grand Jury 89-2" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
The government's need for the secrecy of the grand jury proceedings is protected by temporarily restraining Twitter from divulging any information about the underlying grand jury subpoena until after this Court issues a final ruling in this matter. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:14 am by PaulKostro
Ed. 2d 1021 (1990); In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 89-3 & 89-4, John Doe 89-129, 902 F.2d 244, 249 (4th Cir. 1990) (acknowledging that the attorney-client privilege extends to “potential co-parties to prospective litigation” when the attorney is involved in the communications). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:24 am
 See Cook Paint and Varnish Co., 258 NLRB 1230 (1981) (finding that an employer committed an unfair labor practice by questioning a union steward and threatening to discipline the steward if he did not turn over his grievance arbitration notes); see e.g., In re: Grand Jury, 995 F.Supp. 332, 336 (E.D.N.Y 1998); and Walker v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:58 am
 JUSTICE DEPARTMENTS (76%); CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS (76%); JURY  ...... [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:35 am
 GRAND JURY (76%); LAW COURTS & TRIBUNALS (76%);  ...... [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Cal. 2007): Jury verdict on 9/21/04 awarding $82M. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Crane, 50 Mich 182, 15 NW 73 (1883); Grand Rapids, etc R Co v Cheseboro, 74 Mich 466; 42 NW 66 (1889); Union Depot Co v Backus, 92 Mich 34; 52 NW 790 (1892). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Each written credit service agreement contained a provision entitled "Waiver of Jury Trial and Arbitration Provision" (hereinafter referred to as "arbitration provision"). [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Although you may choose to request that the alibi witnesses be heard by the grand jury, consider this option carefully. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
(2) Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the third degree if the person drives the vehicle while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) and serious bodily injury results and is a crime of the fourth degree if the person drives the vehicle while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) and bodily injury results [read post]