Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum (Doe)"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
It does not mean a fanciful or capricious doubt, nor does it mean beyond all possibility of doubt. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 145 F.3d 1422, 1424-25 & n.2 (D.C.Cir. 1998)(“[i]f the plaintiff’s cause of action is directed at the government’s intent, however, it makes no sense to permit the government to use the [deliberative process] privilege as a shield”). [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 4:19 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated May 9, 1990, 741 F. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In a jury-research project we once conducted, a very nice older lady at one point threw up her hands and said: “I just want to know if he did it. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
*Second, Gorsuch recognizes that "the fact that a third party has access to or possession of your papers and effects does not necessarily eliminate your interest in them. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1335, 1346 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
The court begins the opinion by explaining that[a]fter a nine-day trial, a jury found Dontavious Blake and Tara Jo Moore guilty of child sex trafficking for managing a prostitution ring involving at least two girls under the age of eighteen. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm
This morning, the Washington Post reported that the Justice Department sought to prevent former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates from testifying before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) as part of the committee’s investigation into Russian interference in the presidential election. [read post]
Prosecutors’ Foregone Conclusion Argument Against Fifth Amendment Opposition to Decrypting Computers
23 Mar 2017, 8:34 pm
” In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Mar. 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1335, n. 19 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
’ Doe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1341 at 1345. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1341 at 1345. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
This can be true `whether under a search warrant or a subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 2:23 pm
The 11th Circuit’s Precedent Doe’s position relies in large part on an 2012 11th Circuit decision by Judge Tjoflat, In re Subpoena Duces Tecum, that applied the foregone conclusion doctrine in a somewhat similar way. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The U.S. itself takes exactly the same position with respect to grand jury subpoenas compelling production of records stored abroad, and (as discussed below) with respect to the SCA provisions compelling production of email data stored abroad. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:48 am
In re Grand Jury Duces Tecum, supra. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
What does this language do? [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:10 am
A cautionary note about raising tribal immunity from a federal subpoena: For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the subpoena duces tecum was unenforceable after the expiration of the issuing grand jury. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm
FricosuU.S. v Doe (In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011)Share this: || Join EFF [read post]
