Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum (Doe)"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
*Second, Gorsuch recognizes that "the fact that a third party has access to or possession of your papers and effects does not necessarily eliminate your interest in them. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm
., for instance, asked Verrilli if the government could criminalize lying about whether one received a high school diploma.In other news, the 11th Circuit came out with a fascinating opinion today (In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011 USA v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
Last year, in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum,670 F.3d 1335 (U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am
A case that comes to mind is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Nov. 15, 1993, 846 F.Supp. 11 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (Mukasey, J.). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:17 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena to Kramerbooks & Afterwords, Inc., 26 Med. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 2:23 pm
The 11th Circuit’s Precedent Doe’s position relies in large part on an 2012 11th Circuit decision by Judge Tjoflat, In re Subpoena Duces Tecum, that applied the foregone conclusion doctrine in a somewhat similar way. [read post]
Prosecutors’ Foregone Conclusion Argument Against Fifth Amendment Opposition to Decrypting Computers
23 Mar 2017, 8:34 pm
” In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Mar. 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1335, n. 19 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum, 228 F.3d 341, 348 (4th Cir. 2000) (discussing practical distinctions between search warrant and grand jury subpoena). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm
This morning, the Washington Post reported that the Justice Department sought to prevent former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates from testifying before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) as part of the committee’s investigation into Russian interference in the presidential election. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
., The Common Interest Rule, supra (quoting In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F.3d 910 (U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
If we indulge the assumption that the investigation is tied to some grand jury inquiry (likely in most, though not all scenarios) then resistance to a valid subpoena is quite hard. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Complaint in Superior Court of California (March 20, 2018) Common Cause FEC Complaint re: Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1341 at 1345. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
’ Doe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The U.S. itself takes exactly the same position with respect to grand jury subpoenas compelling production of records stored abroad, and (as discussed below) with respect to the SCA provisions compelling production of email data stored abroad. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 670 F.3d 1341 at 1345. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:56 am
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992, 1 F.3d 93 (`production may not be refused [i]f the government can demonstrate with reasonable particularity that it knows of the existence and location of subpoenaed documents’). . . . [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:22 am
But when the Jihadis walked right through “law enforcement” and blew up downtown that bright fall day, they blew up much of what the remained debatable in the debate about privacy and technology — or, at least, so it seemed, until a year ago, when the 11th Circuit issued an important ruling in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, summarized here by Joel Hruska: [A] John Doe . . . was… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
What does this language do? [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 4:19 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated May 9, 1990, 741 F. [read post]
