Search for: "In Re Grausz"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2009, 4:42 am
See Grausz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
the court writes persuasively about the concept: "In bankruptcy proceedings, the general rule arising under 11 USC § 330(a)(4) is that "a finding of malpractice would mean that the attorneys were not entitled to compensation for those services found to be substandard" and, accordingly, failure to raise the malpractice claims when the final fee applications were considered and approved by the Bankruptcy Court barred later litigation of such claims under principles of… [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:05 am
., J. the court writes persuasively about the concept: "In bankruptcy proceedings, the general rule arising under 11 USC § 330(a)(4) is that "a finding of malpractice would mean that the attorneys were not entitled to compensation for those services found to be substandard" and, accordingly, failure to raise the malpractice claims when the final fee applications were considered and approved by the Bankruptcy Court barred later litigation of such claims under principles of… [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
See, e.g., In re Seven Fields Dev. [read post]
