Search for: "In Re Greystone III Joint Venture"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2013, 10:35 am
The court rejected any inquiry into the debtor’s motive for the impairment, and noted that the anti-gerrymandering principle set forth in In re Greystone III Joint Venture, 995 F.2d 1274 (5th Cir. 1991), does not override the plain language of Section 1129(a)(10). [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 10:35 am
The court rejected any inquiry into the debtor’s motive for the impairment, and noted that the anti-gerrymandering principle set forth in In re Greystone III Joint Venture, 995 F.2d 1274 (5th Cir. 1991), does not override the plain language of Section 1129(a)(10). [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
Pa. 1995); In re Spencer Creek Properties, 2010 Bankr. [read post]
