Search for: "In Re Grynberg"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
One thing we might want to take into account is people’s views when they’re not consumers. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
But one of the harms we’re interested in is an intangible that is very dynamic, consumer understanding, which means we want a second regime, tort-like. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 11:12 am
Grynberg: how do consumers of these products feel? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Michael Grynberg, DePaul University College of LawThick Marks Thin MarksMark might be strong but receive weak protection based on nature of claim, such as nominative fair use. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Mark Lemley: Intermediate approaches in general may not be a bad idea, but worries that we’re not very good with “you’re in the door, but only a little bit, so you get very narrow rights. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
Grynberg: doesn’t understand the assumption that registrants generally want to push the envelope. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
Grynberg: Litman says courts don’t necessarily care about working doctrine pure; Grynberg thinks that they can be attracted to doing so in appropriate circumstances. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
ECJ tends to say that when you’re assessing whether something is devoid of distinctive character/unregistrable, you use the POV of the consumer, and descriptive things ar [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
Doctrinal error: they’re more guidelines to be balanced than elements to be satisfied. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Lemley: don’t assume we’re moving in the right direction. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 9:29 am
Appellee re-stated the issuesand asked the Court to award it attorney fees and costs in defending thisappeal. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Session 2: Responding to Anachronisms Introduction: Mike Grynberg VIP may tell us a lot about what the potentials are. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
A degree of consumer stupidity we’re not prepared to tolerate. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 10:05 am
Digging a bit deeper in time, we have In re Right-On Co. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:05 am
Digging a bit deeper in time, we have In re Right-On Co. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
They’re thinking them through in context of defining the territorial dimension of rights. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
Would worry about Linux people using this proposed structure on Windows.Michael Grynberg, DePaul University College of LawLiving with the Merchandising RightHates it too, but it’s not going anywhere: protecting the mark as the most desirable feature of the product; source designation functions are either irrelevant or distinctly less important. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
If internet has shrunk geographic and product spaces, doesn’t necessarily mean consumer perception of the meaning of distance stays unchanged.Mike Grynberg: there are a lot of doctrines that have similar effects in geog. and product markets—one could look at the Rogers test as a kind of “honest concurrent use” for geography. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
Michael Grynberg Confusion is the boundary limit of the TM right. [read post]
