Search for: "In Re Grynberg"
Results 41 - 54
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
So we’re close to having this doctrine but courts won’t yet take the final step. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Though we may call §43(a) claims unfair competition, because they’re subject to all the same rules as registered TMs, we don’t really think about the differences. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
Grynberg: Tam oral argument, the focus was on source identification—he wrote about why disparaging terms are inherently less likely to identify source [though that gets us back to wholesale/retail].Burrell: In Brunetti: why was the court so desparate to get its hands on the 1A issues? [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Grynberg: functionality has virtue of being somewhat isolated from other doctrines, especially doctrines developed for word marks. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:07 am
Michael Grynberg’s general thesis about TM law: TM law ignores nonconfused consumers, the other 95%, and we should focus on their goals. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
Session 3: Defining Marks in Trademark Law vs. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Is confusion what we’re testing for in those cases anyway? [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
In Europe, for example, they’re considering revising their version of functionality, and it’s bubbling in the US too. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
If we’re lookin [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
They’re much more uncomfortable with having fun. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am
§ 1332(a)(1). [2] Grynberg v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
§ 1332(a)(1). [2] Grynberg v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Barrett thinks we’re unlikely to see more defenses created by the courts. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
If we’re going to engage with boundaries, we should also engage with the instincts courts have about copying. [read post]
